Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: habitable planets
April 27, 2018 at 12:23 pm
(This post was last modified: April 27, 2018 at 12:28 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Well, once already we have gone from less than 10000 breeding individuals to a dense globe spanning swarm of locusts in less than 75,000 years.
I doubt even humanity’s most outstanding trait - its wonton self destructiveness - is close to being the equal of the task of putting a stop to our depredation of our planet.
Posts: 3290
Threads: 118
Joined: January 19, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: habitable planets
April 28, 2018 at 2:34 am
To anyone who is interested in the true future of humanity, I give you
https://www.isaacarthur.net/
FORGET PLANETS! You don't colonize planets - you build them. Our future in space is in rotating habitats that provide exactly the conditions we need or want. We can build enough of these with resources in our own solar system to provide living space for trillions of people - if we want to. I personally hope we will lose our desire to mindlessly reproduce ourselves like a cancer.
The bottom line though is that planets are NOT an ideal place to live. Their gravity well makes them difficult to travel from. The same gravity well pulls in asteroids and comets that can kill us. We originated on a planet but we must not remain tied to it or others like it. We originated on a planet but remaining there is like a baby remaining in a crib.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein
Posts: 46116
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: habitable planets
April 28, 2018 at 6:46 am
I haven't chimed in all that much, because I find this to be a more or less pointless discussion. Here's why:
1. We will never, EVER colonize other planets. It has been nearly a half-century since human beings landed on the moon. If the political and public will was there, Luna City would be a going concern and the Goddard Colonies on Mars would be working towards self sufficiency.
2. We aren't going to build planets or Dyson spheres/swarms or ringworlds. The resources and money simply don't exist for projects of this magnitude. The ISS cost something in the neighbourhood of $150 billion US, and the most people it can sustain at one time is about a dozen. Doing a rough straight-line extrapolation (clumsy, I know), building something in space to sustain just 1000 people would cost twelve thousand trillion dollars. Building something to house any appreciable fraction of humanity would cost a number of dollars so big that it doesn't mean anything.
3. For much the same reason as #2 (coupled with what are very likely insurmountable technical difficulties), we aren't leaving this solar system.
There is only one piece of worthwhile real estate available to us as a species, and we happen to be standing on it.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 46116
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: habitable planets
April 28, 2018 at 7:11 am
Grow up.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 46116
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: habitable planets
April 28, 2018 at 9:00 am
Using absolutes - in this case, anyroad - is what is known as 'realism'. The fact that you opted to respond using a snide reference to fantasy is your own lookout.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax