Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 2:11 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
I just want to say that I don’t take my job as staff personally. I don’t have a problem with Negatio. I didn’t do anything to him personally, staff makes decisions as a whole I just happened to be the one who served the warning.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Sorry, Losty. I didn't mean to imply anything.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 8, 2018 at 2:14 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(September 8, 2018 at 1:44 pm)negatio Wrote: Fucking-cracked reverse-Confucian cracker.  Where the fucking-fuck do you get the fucking fuck-off mistakenly/stupidly ascribing non-sequitur to the great-fucking-Duane?! You are, therefore, without even preliminary hearing, tyrannically  docked 250,000 demerits, for questioning the fucking great, great Duane's deity, asshole.

So...the break didn't help, then?

Boru
Neg can't figure out a line break, para break or much any break. I'm wondering what he does in the morning at this point. Have an existential dilemma, perhaps.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Fun fact: the first Italian edition of the "For Dummies" line of books was called "Per Negati"
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.

Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.

Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.

Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.

Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 7, 2018 at 1:38 pm)negatio Wrote: Stupid, fucking crazy stupid, flippant maniac

Negatio.


QFT
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 8, 2018 at 3:58 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Sorry, Losty. I didn't mean to imply anything.

You’re fine. I just wanted to clarify because it seems like he thinks I’m personally picking on him when it was a staff decision not just me.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 8, 2018 at 3:18 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: [redacted]

I think it's time you moved on, bud. You are a troll. Anyone who was genuinely trying to share philosophical ideas wouldn't be acting like you.

FWIW, we talk about philosophy all the time on these forums. A lot of people here are philosophy fans. I LOVE philosophy... particularly Spinoza and Sartre (though more the former). But I hate this thread. I totally, totally, totally fucking hate this thread. Go away.



Losty was absolutely wonderful until, from within the interiority of the forum's inner workings she, very unethically made a snide remark concerning a post I had written very carefully for Abaddon, in order to explain to him why, in fact, I was all but unable to decipher his computer code, and, he was all but unable to decipher my existentialist language; and, after being whip-sawed back and forth by members regarding what code symbols were requisite to my properly communicating with members, I, in spite of all the contradictory; false; and incorrect examples of code which I was proferred, I, finally. saw some light regarding code.  And, when I was just within literally a few space absences of having BB code for addressing Reply correctly, "staff'', instead of merely saying, hey, Negatio, you have a few too many spaces here, like this, and, it ought to be thus:________; they fucking shit on me with the very fucking destructive law-bullshit which the OP is describing, as ontologically unintelligible and destructive nonsense,  all based on Spinoza's dictum.

Now, you fail to see that I am teasing Khemikal with bullshit, in a parody of the stupid injustice which the unethical Losty, and her associates have so stupidly enacted against my good-faith attempt to adapt to the ignoble sphere which the Atheist/Agnostic Forum has, now, absolutely proven to be, unrelentingly for nearly three weeks now.

Cannot take your own medicine, eh?  Yes, indeed, now I am so radically angered by being subjected to the insanity of nearly every member's obsessive troll superstition, on, and on, and on, that, now, I am openly defying all the horrid, maligned, maltreatment and injustice I have received, and, am, in parody and, in humor, giving members an iota of their own medicine, and the sissies, and, you, the dainty little sissy, who cannot take the selfsame medicine originally dished-out to me, is crying: "Asshole, go away!, for we cannot take our own fucking medicine; for, it is your own medicine which I now, in jest, dish-out, and, you are correct, I am becoming troll-like, and, this, subsequent to three weeks of absolute torture at the hand of all but a few very, very noble members.  Don't worry, Vulcanlogician, I am going, for it is absolute vain vanity to attempt to communicate with others, while in the presence of stupid, uneducated, unreflective, hateful, tactless, destructive personalities like the ignoble Losty, that the only possible tack to ultimately surviving this Atheist hell, is to join you, not to fight you.  All the parody is making for some absolutely excellent humor, don't you think, purported Spinoza lover? Duane
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Excuse me? I very unethically made a snide remark? When?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
He called me ignoble lol
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 8, 2018 at 4:21 pm)Whateverist Wrote:
(September 7, 2018 at 1:38 pm)negatio Wrote: Stupid, fucking crazy stupid, flippant maniac

Negatio.


QFT


Whateverist, what does QFT mean? Negatio

(September 8, 2018 at 5:37 pm)Losty Wrote: Excuse me? I very unethically made a snide remark? When?



Losty, I will now wade through the absolutely massive series of posts which now appear on my thread, to find where, in a little green horizontal box, you, I thought it was you, and, am not certain, wrote something like " This is really getting tiresome."  First,  I have to hike up the hill to my Ivory Tower, where I left a 4x4 this morning, to bring it back down here to the death trap (per Abaddon) cabin...Negatio.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 1056 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 1697 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: CuriosityBob
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 12440 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3723 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3457 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 3290 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 6443 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 34893 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5985 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6777 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)