Ontological Disproof of God

[Abaddon_ire]

Bob Kelso
According to forum rules, there, really, is absolutely no insult permitted within the forum.

You are simply wrong. As has been explained to you repeatedly.

Staff has both indulged members insulting other members, and, thereby inter-insulting has gone completely, and destructively out of control.

You brought that upon yourself.

I am in process of interacting with staff regarding the inappropriate and illegal employment of insult, instead of rational argument, within the forum.

Under the circumstances, it is entirely appropriate and unless you propose to use the courts of North Korea, none of it is illegal.

I have requested a formal ruling on the meaning of what I call sentence three.

Why? You know in advance that you will simply disagree with any such ruling.

I have provided staff with an Aristotelian syllogism whereby I logically demonstrate the illegality of use of the "troll'' insult within the forum.

Like anyone cares.

Staff sees everything I say to them as trolling.  If staff and I can possibly reason together, and, get beyond the insulting, there is a chance we can return to a discussion of Deity

There's your problem. You are too busy playing the victim. You have no desire to get back to the OP, none whatsoever. How do I know this? Because every time such an opportunity has been presented, you have refused.

however, I, personally cannot do the dialogical dialectic while under the constant, spiraling, horrid insult that I am a troll trolling.  I am a person seeking dialogical dialectical interaction

Entirely of your own making. At this point, not only have olive branches been offered, an entire olive grove has been offered and you still refused.

At this point I am wondering what the rest of us will do with all these leftover olives.

with others regarding my positions, and, such is all there is to what I am doing and with what I wish to do here; unless we, all, taken together, can transcend this insane constant seeing
of trolls/trolling in everything a new  member does, that member is defeated right from the git-go. So, staff maintains that it is not a ban that they want for me, we'll see, personally,

Well, at least we have some salad to go with the olives.

We were all new members once. We are all still here merrily posting away without any of the problems you claim. The problem here is clearly YOU.

given the way I am now addressing the staff,by point blank honestly, I expect to be instantly banned in very short order....Negatio

Your appeal to victimhood is most unimpressive.

[Angrboda]

Somebody else whose posts were controversial also bragged about having an I.Q. in the superior range recently. Unfortunately, I'm not able to find it. We may have a sock on our hands.

[Abaddon_ire]

Somebody else whose posts were controversial also bragged about having an I.Q. in the superior range recently.  Unfortunately, I'm not able to find it.  We may have a sock on our hands.

Rule of Thumb: If one has to brag about one's IQ, one likely has a low IQ with matching chip on shoulder. Possibly both shoulders.

[Bob Kelso]

At this point I am wondering what the rest of us will do with all these leftover olives.

I propose a martini party. Plenty of garnish to use.

[Abaddon_ire]

At this point I am wondering what the rest of us will do with all these leftover olives.

I propose a martini party. Plenty of garnish to use.

Oooo, good thinking Bob. 

[negatio]

Khemikal is conflating Sartreian theory with what Khemikal is, in fact, not permitted, by sentence three of primal introduction rules within the forum, to do, I. e., insult. Neither Negatio, nor Khemikal, nor any member of he forum is permitted, by forum rules to insult another member.

I have to conjure up all the honesty possible within the struggle against the trolling insult. Frankly, at this point Abaddon, I no longer really care, one way or the other, for, one way or the
other, staff is bent on banning me, staff just sits in the wings watching all that I do and say, just waiting for the next violation which I commit, while, all the while, staff is differentially enforcing forum rules, by allowing me to be subjected to the troll insult, instead of, per forum rules, protecting me, as a newbie, from forum insult; thereby, via staff's indifference to me being constantly insulted by both members and staff, staff simultaneously enforces and violates the selfsame rules staff purports to subscribe to. This whole damned situation is so radically ugly that I no longer am enthusiastic about any possible future I may have in the forum; the forum is just far too paralyzed by seeing troll/trolling everywhere, and, by an inauthentically self-inconsistent application of forum law to both members and, staff. Staff has decided to pursue the project of getting rid of me, not because of errors which I have made in coding, etc., I believe the authentic reason I am to be rid of is that no one really wants their platform to end up mediating logical demonstration that both god and law are ontologically unintelligible constructs. Negatio

[Abaddon_ire]

At this point, I am kind of hoping he doesn't buy a ban hammer.

This is endlessly entertaining.

[Silver]

[brewer]

Then why do you persist? Just walk away and accept your failure.

[Angrboda]

I don't know, I for one would be interested in seeing this "Aristotlean syllogism" proving that insult is illegal, just for shits and giggles.