Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 1:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Gone, who's gone ? I may be a real gone guy, but I am not gone from here yet, still have 50% life.

If it is incorrect to maintain no insult is permitted on the site, please boil why down into a nutshell, why ? Because the wording of Sentence three is clear to me, why is the meaning seen, by staff and members, in an entirely opposite way ? And, I am not being purposefully obtuse ! Negatio

Oh, yes, I see, the spirit of the rules trumps any literal interpretation of the rules, and, since according to staff, the spirit of the rule in question is that insult is totally acceptable upon the forum, other than within the introductory forum, the rule must mean what staff says it means by mere virtue of the fact that the staff exists.

Wow, that's a great new means of me arguing a theoretical position, I. e., I am correct because I exist. Wow, cool ! Totally bomb-proof argument !

Oh, now I see, the forum hails out of North Korea ! How could I have been so obtuse !

It is becoming clear, and this has been the case all along, that there is no reasoning with members and staff is possible, and, I can point out precisely why, in the instance of sentence three.

However, I wish, first, to hear if anyone is willing to give a nutshell explanation of why staff/members and I are at direct opposites in the interpretation of the sentence in question.
Negatio
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Because you don’t know the difference between “please try” and “you must”...
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 6:31 pm)Losty Wrote: Because you don’t know the difference between “please try” and “you must”...

My impression of what he meant by sentence three was the "Note that this does not give you a carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in other areas of the forums" part.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 6:06 pm)negatio Wrote: Gone, who's gone ?  I may be a real gone guy, but I am not gone from here yet, still  have 50% life.

If it is incorrect to maintain no insult is permitted on the site, please boil why down into a nutshell, why ? Because the wording of Sentence three is clear to me, why is the meaning seen, by staff and members, in an entirely opposite way ?  And, I am not being purposefully obtuse !  Negatio

Oh, yes, I see, the spirit of the rules trumps any literal interpretation of the rules, and, since according to staff, the spirit of the rule  in question is that insult is totally acceptable upon the forum, other than within the introductory forum, the rule must mean what staff says it means by mere virtue of the fact that the staff exists.

Wow, that's a great new means of me arguing  a theoretical position, I. e., I am correct because I exist. Wow, cool !  Totally bomb-proof argument !

It is becoming clear, and this has been the case all along, that there is no reasoning with members and staff is possible, and, I can point out precisely why, in the instance of sentence three.

However, I wish, first, to hear if anyone is willing to give a nutshell explanation of why staff/members and I are at direct opposites in the interpretation of the sentence in question.
Negatio

By the great, golden, greasy gonads of God, are you STILL grinding on this?  Fuxxake, pick some other topic and move on.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 6:06 pm)negatio Wrote: [edit] ...anyone is willing to give a nutshell explanation of why staff/members and I are at direct opposites in the interpretation of the sentence in question.
Negatio

Because your interpretation serves your position of protecting and defending your fragile ego.

BTW: schizophrenogenic was debunked years ago as faulty, just so you know to stop using that victim position.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Ordinarily, on Earth:

The real is rational and he rational is real.

However, here, in the forum, the irrational is real and the real is irrational. Negatio

Surely, Boru, I shall immediately resign my original freedom, and, from here on out, I promise to think precisely like you, fine.

(September 13, 2018 at 6:34 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 6:31 pm)Losty Wrote: Because you don’t know the difference between “please try” and “you must”...

My impression of what he meant by sentence three was the "Note that this does not give you a carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in other areas of the forums" part.



Yes, J., that is what I am referring to.  Losty, the part about "Please try..." appears below, appears subsequent to the prime point of the rule, which is that members do not possess a 


carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in all the other areas of the forum... ''please try'' is super sweet, then the author goes on to lay out the rule, the correct 


procedure...refer the matters to staff...do not handle it yourself, i.e . do not handle perceived trolling yourselves...

The rules of the Atheist Forum are such that members are not permitted to handle perceived trolling, themselves, via insult. Do not insult the perceived trolls, be nice, be sweet, at all times, and, refer the matter to staff. Nuff said, I will drop it now.

Thank you Jormungandr. Negatio
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 6:34 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 6:31 pm)Losty Wrote: Because you don’t know the difference between “please try” and “you must”...

My impression of what he meant by sentence three was the "Note that this does not give you a carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in other areas of the forums" part.

Ah well that’s easy, you’re allowed to insult to an extent but you don’t have carte blanche to insult. Ie..the flaming rule.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
You already received an official staff ruling on this matter, as per your request. There will be no further explanations for you. Get back to the topic of the thread.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Quote:Surely, Boru, I shall immediately resign my original freedom, and, from here on out, I promise to think precisely like you, fine.

No one's asking you to resign anything, or think in any particular way.  But everyone here knows the difference between living and deceased horses, and I really think it's time you stopped flogging the latter.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
I can see it now: Abaddon the Sweet.

Boru, Losty, I just said, Nuff said. Ya-all are bringing it up again. I'm done with the topic; Jormungandr stepped-in and assisted in the proper explication of the rule.. Losty, do not order me about as if I were your peon, that shit does not work with an American, and just gets one's ire up. Will you ever learn to be sweet at all times to new members ? Oh, Losty, you are so so sweet, just a little sweetie pie...Negatio P.S. I am considering changing my handle... perhaps to: Positivio
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 694 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 1356 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: CuriosityBob
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 12209 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3688 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3429 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 3219 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 6303 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 34412 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5818 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6743 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)