Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 9, 2019, 4:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proof by Rearrangement of the Pythagorean Theorem
RE: Proof by Rearrangement of the Pythagorean Theorem
Expanding on what Polymath said...

From earlier theorems (if we're talking Euclidean geometry, that is, the Pythagorean theorem doesn't hold in non-euclidean geometry), we know the sum of the angles of a triangle to be 180 degrees. I'll name those three angles A, B, and C, which are opposite of the sides of lengths a, b, and c respectively Since we design the triangles in the proof by rearrangement to be congruent right triangles, we know that C is 90 degrees, and so A and B (WHATEVER they are, it will vary with the values of a and b) have to add up to 90 degrees. Then we rearrange the triangles so that each leg of length a is collinear and flush against the next leg b. Because they are collinear, the three angles there must total 180 degrees. Since we know that A and B together total 90 degrees, that means the unknown interior angle must be 90 degrees. Either appeal to similarity or just repeat the process four times, and ALL of the unknown interior angles are 90 degrees. Since all four sides of the interior figure are the same length, c, and all the angles are 90 degrees, we do in fact have a square.
Being an antipistevist is like being an antipastovist, only with epistemic responsibility instead of bruschetta.

Ignore list includes: 1 douche bag (Drich)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Mathematical Proof Thread Kernel Sohcahtoa 67 8041 July 6, 2018 at 8:37 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Fundemental theorem of Calculus intuition A Handmaid 19 1938 August 28, 2016 at 12:52 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Million Dollar Prize for Math proof of NP problems emilynghiem 6 2475 February 22, 2015 at 12:47 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  "Gödel's ontological proof" proves existence of God Belac Enrobso 41 12005 February 9, 2015 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Godels theorem is invalide for 5 reasons shakuntala 8 2755 December 21, 2014 at 1:04 pm
Last Post: agnesi
  Mathematical proof.. lifesagift 20 4900 September 26, 2014 at 5:01 pm
Last Post: lifesagift
Information My proof for de morgans law LogicMaster 17 3933 May 29, 2014 at 7:55 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Mathematician Claims Proof of Connection between Prime Numbers KichigaiNeko 10 5658 September 26, 2012 at 3:18 am
Last Post: Categories+Sheaves
  Need a proof (real analysis) CliveStaples 8 4823 August 2, 2012 at 10:11 pm
Last Post: CliveStaples
  Mathematical proof of the existence of God JudgeDracoAmunRa 20 10719 March 30, 2012 at 11:43 am
Last Post: JudgeDracoAmunRa

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)