Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 1:00 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
WW2 Tanks.... A question....
RE: WW2 Tanks.... A question....
(December 6, 2018 at 8:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
Quote:Instead they are mean to oil for weak points in enemy defenses, break through and attack vulnerable rear areas.

^^Exactly this. In fact, the original purpose of tanks in WWI was to break through barbed wire emplacements, opening a path for infantry.

Boru

Yep, and some countries were ready to fight WWI again in 1939. "Infantry" tanks, meant to be mobile strongpoints, were to plod along with the ground pounders.
Reply
RE: WW2 Tanks.... A question....
(December 6, 2018 at 8:15 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(December 6, 2018 at 8:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: ^^Exactly this. In fact, the original purpose of tanks in WWI was to break through barbed wire emplacements, opening a path for infantry.

Boru

Yep, and some countries were ready to fight WWI again in 1939. "Infantry" tanks, meant to be mobile strongpoints, were to plod along with the ground pounders.

All I know being the wimp I am, if I hear one weapon make a big bang near me, I am going to run for cover.
Reply
RE: WW2 Tanks.... A question....
(December 6, 2018 at 8:32 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
(December 6, 2018 at 8:15 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Yep, and some countries were ready to fight WWI again in 1939. "Infantry" tanks, meant to be mobile strongpoints, were to plod along with the ground pounders.

All I know being the wimp I am, if I hear one weapon make a big bang near me, I am going to run for cover.

Meh, if you hear it you're okay.
Reply
RE: WW2 Tanks.... A question....
(December 6, 2018 at 8:15 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(December 6, 2018 at 8:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: ^^Exactly this. In fact, the original purpose of tanks in WWI was to break through barbed wire emplacements, opening a path for infantry.

Boru

Yep, and some countries were ready to fight WWI again in 1939. "Infantry" tanks, meant to be mobile strongpoints, were to plod along with the ground pounders.

Don’t knock infantry tanks.  The Churchill infantry tank was better protected than the Tiger I and the Panther, and provided good service through the Korean War.
Reply
RE: WW2 Tanks.... A question....
(December 7, 2018 at 9:52 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:
(December 6, 2018 at 8:15 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Yep, and some countries were ready to fight WWI again in 1939. "Infantry" tanks, meant to be mobile strongpoints, were to plod along with the ground pounders.

Don’t knock infantry tanks.  The Churchill infantry tank was better protected than the Tiger I and the Panther, and provided good service through the Korean War.

An aside, the sitcom MASH had me believing the Korean war went on for a decade. It wasn't until a couple years ago I looked it up and found out how short it was in reality for the time America was involved. The other thing is, I they had a motion graphic of the entire war,, the push back and forth, the graphic was only about a minute and half, from start date to the agreed DMZ. The allies almost got to China, then almost got pushed south to the sea, then at the end the country was split.
Reply
RE: WW2 Tanks.... A question....
(December 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)Brian37 Wrote:
(December 7, 2018 at 9:52 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: Don’t knock infantry tanks.  The Churchill infantry tank was better protected than the Tiger I and the Panther, and provided good service through the Korean War.

An aside, the sitcom MASH had me believing the Korean war went on for a decade. It wasn't until a couple years ago I looked it up and found out how short it was in reality for the time America was involved. The other thing is, I they had a motion graphic of the entire war,, the push back and forth, the graphic was only about a minute and half, from start date to the agreed DMZ. The allies almost got to China, then almost got pushed south to the sea, then at the end the country was split.

But first we were pushed almost to Japan. I pointed out elsewhere* that the fact that Pusan never fell was proof that the NORKs would have never won the war. Pusan held out until the US got our shit together and then we rolled them up. China reacted as expected, but earlier than expected.

*Purdue
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Want to know WW2 history? Brian37 12 1734 June 13, 2023 at 9:57 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  WW2 facts. Brian37 23 1634 September 13, 2020 at 12:53 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  CIVIL WAR/WW2 history...... help me out. Brian37 12 1195 June 23, 2020 at 9:11 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Russia-Poland row over start of WW2 escalates Duty 15 1288 January 1, 2020 at 10:30 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Lately stuck on WW2 history. Brian37 60 3818 December 7, 2018 at 6:09 pm
Last Post: Deesse23
  The Tuskegee "Red Tails" of WW2 Brian37 17 867 July 25, 2018 at 8:14 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)