I'm the winner!

[brewer]

Welcome.

[SYZ]

I am the first person to be banned from AD.

[snip]

So now I'm here. I just wanted to share my story about woefully not up to the task the mods are over at AD. They're running a little clique over there, and their skin is way too thin for the forum to ever be all that interesting to many people.

As someone familiar with your passive-aggressive, egotistical, and patronising posts on both TTA and AD, I'd just like you to know that
I find the majority of your claims in this lengthy oh-poor-me, diatribe to be misrepresented, unsupported by the evidence, and in parts
outright lies.  You were banned because you flouted the general thrust of the forum's rules, if not for any specific point.

I also object to the aspersions you've made about the moderators and/or moderating procedures at AD. It's very poor netiquette to
disparage another site simply because of sour grapes, and it's particularly unfortunate that the very first post you made on this forum
is exactly that—rather than some sort of introduction.  It all seems very childish to say the least.

PS:    Contrary to your "brag", you weren't the first person to be banned from AD.

[Belacqua]

I think custom dictates that Intro threads aren't the place to fight.

Plenty of time for that later.

[RobbyPants]

The great thing about the internet is it's super easy to just cross-post the thread in question. Everything relevant happened within the first 2 1/2 pages.

[Losty]

...welcome to AF

[brewer]

Nothing wrong with a fresh start. Time will tell.

[Alan V]

Nothing is ever the way that you remember it, Thor.

Yes, perhaps you are right. It's a common human failing.

[LadyForCamus]

...welcome to AF

*snort*

[arewethereyet]

I am the first person to be banned from AD.

[snip]

So now I'm here. I just wanted to share my story about woefully not up to the task the mods are over at AD. They're running a little clique over there, and their skin is way too thin for the forum to ever be all that interesting to many people.

As someone familiar with your passive-aggressive, egotistical, and patronising posts on both TTA and AD, I'd just like you to know that
I find the majority of your claims in this lengthy oh-poor-me, diatribe to be misrepresented, unsupported by the evidence, and in parts
outright lies.  You were banned because you flouted the general thrust of the forum's rules, if not for any specific point.

I also object to the aspersions you've made about the moderators and/or moderating procedures at AD. It's very poor netiquette to
disparage another site simply because of sour grapes, and it's particularly unfortunate that the very first post you made on this forum
is exactly that—rather than some sort of introduction.  It all seems very childish to say the least.

PS:    Contrary to your "brag", you weren't the first person to be banned from AD.

[DLJ]

...
Shit hit the fan when they started trolling a discussion that I titled 'AOC!'
...
The moderators started trolling the discussion, complaining about me naming the thread AOC.  They made up a new rule on the spot, claiming that acronyms were 'disrupting the smooth operation of the forum'. We were all veterans of a bazillion discussions with acronyms in the titles.  No one had ever said anything about it before. 
...

For my first post at AD, I am sorely tempted to post in the ‘Adjacent Threads That Read Funny’ a screen shot I took of:
AOC
NFL

I mean, what the fuck is an NFL? “One should not have to read an article to figure out what the thread title means.”
...

...
They're running a little clique over there, and their skin is way too thin for the forum to ever be all that interesting to many people.
...

Well, what do you expect from a matriarchal society?