Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 2, 2026, 5:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How about this..
#41
RE: How about this..
(July 29, 2019 at 4:29 pm)Drich Wrote:
(July 29, 2019 at 3:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: If Drich can name all 12 apostles, I'll agree to his deal.

Boru

who's apostles?

the word apostles simply means a servant sent out under orders.

If you are referring to the apostles of Christ there are a few lists in whom is to be considered an apostle and who is not. one list is left in a gospel but out of the names given very little is known about everything these men did. A few consider them apostle by name only. and then there are men who in the book of acts where actually recorded in doing what Jesus commands. a promiate name to this list is Paul/saul of tarsus. at the time of Jesus' death he was a staunch Pharisee and hunted down christians to have them killed/stoned. Till Jesus himself intervened. while not apart of the original 12 disciples (which included judas iscariot) who hanged himself for betraying Jesus and did not become an apostle, the 11 elected another of the disciples (christ had many not just the 12 at the end of his ministry there were 120 disciples.) how ever in luke 6 the original names are listed which include judas iscariot who again betrayed jesus and died by his own hand.

 then two men were nominated in to replace judas from the 120 close/serious disciples (men who sold everything and follow jesus out of faith and was there at the baptism and witnessed the resurrection)  those two where Matthias and  Joseph called Barsabbas and according to acts 1. Matthias won this right to be identified as Judas' replacement. Again however little is known about these twelve out side of church lore. the bible seems to take a different direction in naming the Apstoles of Christ which begins with paul and follows his lot as identified by luke. in the book of acts.

So again who's Apostles.. 

then if Christ which list?

Jesus compiled a list at the beginning of his ministry found in all of the gospels which includes judas..

The remaining 11 had a list of names in acts one after the ascension and the death of judas..

and again by deed there is yet another list of Paul luke timothy in conjunction with some of the original church all who worked to establish the lords Church as it is today.

So before I assume, I would like more info to clear up any confusion as per my new mandate.

So, you can't name the twelve Apostles.  Thought as much. Fair enough.  If makes it easier for you, I'll settle for the twelve named Disciples of Jesus of Nazareth.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#42
RE: How about this..
Larry, Mo, Curly.

John, Paul, George and Ringo.

Dave, Dee, Dozy, Mick and Tich.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#43
RE: How about this..
(July 29, 2019 at 7:51 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Larry, Mo, Curly.

John, Paul, George and Ringo.

Dave, Dee, Dozy, Mick and Tich.

I thought they were Spanky, Gurkin,  Embele, Jeremy, Lenny, George, Grumpy, Happy, Sleepy, Bashful, Sneezy, Dopey, and Doc, plus Rumpelbold who betrayed jebus according to the gospels of spanky, sneezy, dopey and lenny?
Reply
#44
RE: How about this..
(July 29, 2019 at 6:02 pm)Drich Wrote:
(July 29, 2019 at 4:23 pm)Deesse23 Wrote: I am an engineer since the mid 90s and understood thermodynamic laws since the mid 80s. You didn't even know it's not 'thermal dynamics' since a few posts ago.

So who do you think you are fooling with your cheap bluffs?
But by all means, please continue to demonstrate that you have earned the title of village idiot.
So please tell me how what I said violates the 2nd law..

You are the village idiot. Mathilda has already made a nice summary of what has happened here and the lunacy you are engaged in here. 

I do not have the time nor the interest of engaging erratic village idiots in serious conversation. You are no threat, teacher or challenge, you are a punching ball. I punch the ball when i feel i want to, i do not argue with it.

You arent happy with not being taken serious? Stop being erratic, stop lying, stop strwamanning, stop your oh-so-transparent over inflation of yourself. You know, smart people can pretend to be stupid, you are trying it the other way around. Stop being a dick, start being a (somewhat) decent poster. I do not have to like the people i am engaging in discourse, but i have to respect them. You have done pretty much nothing to warrant my respect, its quite the other way around. I dont even have a problem with the ignorant, but with those who like to stay ignorant.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#45
RE: How about this..
Sweet baby Jesus, how many threads are you going to make about this?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#46
RE: How about this..
I've talked it over with everyone and we agree to your deal. :-)




Reply
#47
RE: How about this..
Reply
#48
RE: How about this..
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#49
RE: How about this..
Reply
#50
RE: How about this..
This is hilarious.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)