Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 3:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Friendly Atheism
#81
RE: Friendly Atheism
(September 8, 2019 at 2:59 pm)mcc1789 Wrote:
(September 8, 2019 at 6:13 am)Belaqua Wrote: Yeah, those are notoriously slippery ideas to get a hold of.

I wonder if it would be too far off topic for this thread.

Well, it pertains to whether theism could be rational I'd say, so not yet.

I responded to a couple of points: 

That in a major portion of theology, existence and consciousness are not prior one to the other. 

That classical theology is different from pantheism.

But I don't have the energy at the moment to argue the whole case -- it's an enormously big subject.
Reply
#82
RE: Friendly Atheism
For clarity:

Pantheism = God and universe, one and the same
Panentheism = universe is a manifestation of divine energy/God but is not all of God

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
Reply
#83
RE: Friendly Atheism
(September 8, 2019 at 6:42 pm)Belaqua Wrote:
(September 8, 2019 at 2:59 pm)mcc1789 Wrote: Well, it pertains to whether theism could be rational I'd say, so not yet.

I responded to a couple of points: 

That in a major portion of theology, existence and consciousness are not prior one to the other. 

That classical theology is different from pantheism.

But I don't have the energy at the moment to argue the whole case -- it's an enormously big subject.

All right.

(September 8, 2019 at 7:10 pm)Grandizer Wrote: For clarity:

Pantheism = God and universe, one and the same
Panentheism = universe is a manifestation of divine energy/God but is not all of God

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism

The way you and Wikipedia explain it doesn't seem much different from classical theism. I've heard that it means everything is inside of God (like Berkeley's view that all things are just God's ideas).
Reply
#84
RE: Friendly Atheism
Friendly atheism sounds to me like the Templeton prize, which is awarded to various rubber wristed atheist wankers who have something positive to say about religion.

Martin Rees, I'm looking at you.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Reply
#85
RE: Friendly Atheism
(September 9, 2019 at 10:16 pm)Succubus Wrote: Friendly atheism sounds to me like the Templeton prize, which is awarded to various rubber wristed atheist wankers who have something positive to say about religion.  

Martin Rees, I'm looking at you.

Well, that isn't what William Rowe meant by it. Despite saying theism could be rational in some cases, he still criticized it his entire career.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)