Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 11:47 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The code that is DNA
RE: The code that is DNA
I don't follow.
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 9:31 pm)no one Wrote: I don't follow.
Sorry i was just saying John can spew fourth big words but he doesn't have a clue
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
I meant the "understanding" of the big words.
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 9:06 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(December 25, 2019 at 8:43 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Fruit flies so genetically different from each other that they can no longer mate. What did you think they would evolve into? Horses?

A horse sounds about right since macroevolution operates above the species level. The spawning of a new species of flies through the criteria of reproductive isolation, is not macroevolution, it's speciation at best.

Good god. What do you think evolution is?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 9:36 pm)no one Wrote: I meant the "understanding" of the big words.
Oh i was referring to people saying big words at you but not understanding them

(December 25, 2019 at 9:38 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(December 25, 2019 at 9:06 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: A horse sounds about right since macroevolution operates above the species level. The spawning of a new species of flies through the criteria of reproductive isolation, is not macroevolution, it's speciation at best.

Good god. What do you think evolution is?
[Image: Crocoduck.jpg]
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 9:38 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Good god. What do you think evolution is?

Change.
RE: The code that is DNA
Quote:Change.
Vague
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
These two dogs can successfully breed. This is happened in the last century directly through human selection.

[Image: Great-Dane-Chihuahua-Mix.jpg]
RE: The code that is DNA
You can use big words to disguise a steaming pile of horseshit but it won't make it smell any sweeter.

(December 24, 2019 at 5:41 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: 1. That phylogenies are hypotheses.
2. That they are not (or are rarely) testable.

For example, if Breezy had the first clue about what he was talking about he'd know that these two statements are mutually exclusive. It's basic scientific method that hypotheses must be testable. If they aren't they're just baseless opinion. So at least one of those misbegotten combinations of big words is just plain wrong.
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 11:15 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: It's basic scientific method that hypotheses must be testable.

Agreed; I don't mind calling phylogenies unscientific. But since they are testable in theory, not in practice, they remain technically falsifiable and scientific.



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 2877 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Are humans half aliens? Human DNA question Signa92 14 1951 December 30, 2018 at 12:34 am
Last Post: Rahn127
Brick Atheist moral code Void 45 15689 March 24, 2015 at 8:14 pm
Last Post: I Am Not A Human Being



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)