Covid 19 conspiracies dump

[Mister Agenda]

I also found it shocking that Fauci said such a thing, and I don't blame you for questioning such an insane quote, but you know google exists and you might want to use that before going on the attack against me. I'm glad that we can at least agree that this would be some of the most clownish propaganda if Fauci did say it... so here you are.

So what Fauci actually said is that they're not actually criticizing him, they're criticizing science. That sounds right.

[brewer]

I also found it shocking that Fauci said such a thing, and I don't blame you for questioning such an insane quote, but you know google exists and you might want to use that before going on the attack against me. I'm glad that we can at least agree that this would be some of the most clownish propaganda if Fauci did say it... so here you are.

So what Fauci actually said is that they're not actually criticizing him, they're criticizing science. That sounds right.

I heard the Fauci thinks the anti-vaxxers attack him because it's easier than attacking science, so the anti-vaxxers believe he represents science and is the easier target.

Listen again IA, critically, without your over riding agenda getting in the way.

Edit: Went back a page and read posts, apparently I'm beating a dead horse. Excuse me for being unintentionally repetitive.

[Deesse23]

Calm down. I did not lie. Fauci said criticizing him is criticizing science. He also said he represents science. I did not lie about what he said.

Fauci says again that he represents science, and that criticizing him is criticizing science itself. I'm afraid that's not how science works, Dr. Fauci.

The NIH admits gain of function research was funded, and he continues to deny this. He is a proven liar, many times over.

And now either link to the video, or give us a transcript of what he said (full context!) in the video, liar. If not, i will post the video with the exact timestamp of the relevant passage, or write doen the word by word transcript myself, liar. I will calm down, when you admit to being a fucking liar. I will calm down when you and your lies are fully exposed (again), liar. Got it?

The issue at hand is not if you are a liar. Its about you being comfortable being exposed as a liar. Are you?

[Irreligious Atheist]

So what Fauci actually said is that they're not actually criticizing him, they're criticizing science. That sounds right.

I heard the Fauci thinks the anti-vaxxers attack him because it's easier than attacking science, so the anti-vaxxers believe he represents science and is the easier target.

Listen again IA, critically, without your over riding agenda getting in the way.

Edit: Went back a page and read posts, apparently I'm beating a dead horse. Excuse me for being unintentionally repetitive.

Sounds to me like you think you are defending science, but you are taking a giant dump on the scientific method because you want to stick it to Trump because Trump and Fauci didn't get along. Lame.

https://humanize.today/2021/12/faucis-cl...i-science/

[Brian37]

The GOP have lost their fucking minds. Ted and others on that side were willing to take the economy off the cliff just to pander to their scientifically ignorant base over COVID testing, masks and antivax. But like most cowards, they ultimately chickened out. The stop gap was passed.

[Fake Messiah]

I wonder what will nutjobs with their demented minds make of this one

Biden Thanks Fauci and Jokes That He’s the Real President

“I’ve seen more of Dr. Fauci than I have my wife. We kid each other,” said Biden. “Hey look, who is president? Fauci!”

“But all kidding aside, I sincerely mean it,” Biden continued. But before you panic, understand that he was referring to the sincerity of his gratitude for those dealing with the pandemic and keeping him informed on the latest information.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/biden-thanks...y-mean-it/

[brewer]

I heard the Fauci thinks the anti-vaxxers attack him because it's easier than attacking science, so the anti-vaxxers believe he represents science and is the easier target.

Listen again IA, critically, without your over riding agenda getting in the way.

Edit: Went back a page and read posts, apparently I'm beating a dead horse. Excuse me for being unintentionally repetitive.

Sounds to me like you think you are defending science, but you are taking a giant dump on the scientific method because you want to stick it to Trump because Trump and Fauci didn't get along. Lame.

https://humanize.today/2021/12/faucis-cl...i-science/

You're still not getting it. Facui didn't say he was science, antivaxxers attacks as if he was science.

NIH didn't fund gain of function, the funding was used in an untended way, without NIH prior knowledge. Lets put this into a scenario that maybe you can understand. IA pays a contractor in advance to fix his house and get supplies. The contractor uses the money to buy a gun and robs the lumberyard for supplies. According to your logic IA robbed the lumber yard.

And jesus fucking christ, the author (Discovery Inst senior fellow) has little credibility when it comes to science: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_J._Smith

There may be E. coli where you have your head.

Edit: I'll just stick this here:

https://www.science.org/content/article/...ines-risky

https://www.science.org/content/article/...ice-sicker

IA, please notice that these articels are not written by a lawyer tied to creation science.: https://www.science.org/content/author/jocelyn-kaiser

[Irreligious Atheist]

Sounds to me like you think you are defending science, but you are taking a giant dump on the scientific method because you want to stick it to Trump because Trump and Fauci didn't get along. Lame.

https://humanize.today/2021/12/faucis-cl...i-science/

You're still not getting it. Facui didn't say he was science, antivaxxers attacks as if he was science.

NIH didn't fund gain of function, the funding was used in an untended way, without NIH prior knowledge. Lets put this into a scenario that maybe you can understand. IA pays a contractor in advance to fix his house and get supplies. The contractor uses the money to buy a gun and robs the lumberyard for supplies. According to your logic IA robbed the lumber yard.

And jesus fucking christ, the author (Discovery Inst senior fellow) has little credibility when it comes to science: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_J._Smith

There may be E. coli where you have your head.

Edit: I'll just stick this here:

https://www.science.org/content/article/...ines-risky

https://www.science.org/content/article/...ice-sicker

IA, please notice that these articels are not written by a lawyer tied to creation science.: https://www.science.org/content/author/jocelyn-kaiser

Function was gained. I'm aware that the gain of function was not necessarily intended. This does not make Fauci any less dishonest. Look at the definition below. "The term gain of function research describes a type of research that modifies a biological agent so that it confers new or enhanced activity to that agent." This definition was from the NIH website. The definition does not say that the gain of function has to be intentional. Just that it has to gain function, which it did. Please tell me what I'm missing here. The NIH erasing that definition from their website and moving the goalposts does not make me wrong. It shows that they are attempting to hide something. I understand that you don't like Rand Paul and think he's a jackass. I do as well, for the most part, but that doesn't mean Rand Paul's criticism of Dr. Fauci hasn't been decently fair. Lying to congress is a serious issue and should not be taken lightly.

https://twitter.com/JeremyRedfernFL/stat...fallout%2F

[The Architect Of Fate]

So an epic non response to Brewer 

[Deesse23]

I am still waiting for the link or transcript from Faucis interview. I wonder why IA is not addressing that. Most probably because he is uncomfortable being exposed as a liar, as expected.