Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 4, 2024, 9:51 pm

Poll: Who should use science to support their beliefs?
This poll is closed.
Everyone
58.82%
10 58.82%
Atheists only
5.88%
1 5.88%
Theists only
0%
0 0%
Other
35.29%
6 35.29%
Total 17 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ownership of Science
RE: The Ownership of Science
Quote:What makes the scientific perspective more deserving of attention than any other?
Because it's actually real
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 9:01 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 8:56 pm)Foxaire Wrote: Not all perspectives are deserving of attention.
What makes the scientific perspective more deserving of attention than any other?

Because it works.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 8:16 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 8:02 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: How do you figure?
Because even if that quark shit is true, it has nothing to do with what happens to us on a spiritual level.

Then allow me to explain before you judge.

"That quark shit" is a description of the early moments of our universe. You don't need to understand it for the sake of this discussion beyond the words "unimaginably hot".

At the other end of the time scale you have a universe populated almost exclusively by black holes and that state will exist for some ten million trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years before even those finally evaporate into thinly dispersed, maximally entropic radiation. More simply described as "unspeakably cold".

The current Goldilocks conditions that allow our form of life exist for vanishingly short moment between the universe's fiery origins and its icy destiny. The notion that it is finely tuned to produce the sentient skin disease currently afflicting small parts of one insignificant planet is laughable. The creator would have to be the dimmest bulb never whelped to design a life-producing engine that hilariously inefficient. You and I simply are not what this universe is all about.

Here's a nifty YouTube video. It's longish but a damned sight shorter than its topic.





(November 3, 2021 at 9:01 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 8:56 pm)Foxaire Wrote: Not all perspectives are deserving of attention.
What makes the scientific perspective more deserving of attention than any other?

Have you ever watched a faith-based rocket launch?

[Image: you-will-not-go-to-space-today.jpg]
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 9:10 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 9:01 pm)Ahriman Wrote: What makes the scientific perspective more deserving of attention than any other?

Because it works.
My own personal cosmology works pretty well too. You just gotta believe.
"Imagination, life is your creation"
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 9:22 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 9:10 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Because it works.
My own personal cosmology works pretty well too. You just gotta believe.

Why should we believe your cosmology as opposed to someone else's?

P.S.  Sometimes I get the impression that you are just a troll, and are not a serious participant of this community.
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 8:51 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 8:24 pm)slartibartfast Wrote: Ahri do you even understand Paleo's proposition? The Universe is approx. 13 billion years old ie. roughly 13 x 10^9. For a portion of the Universe's life it was completely incapable of supporting life, as no solid matter even existed. Currently we are in the Stelliferous era, meaning stars form, burn Hydrogen into heavier atoms, blow up and spew those into the cosmos to form more stars and planets. This phase however will not go on forever. 

The Universe is not just expanding and therefore cooling, but will also go through a number of significant transitions. 

When the Stelliferous Era ends, no new stars will form and the Degenerate Era will begin.
Eventually all Galaxies will cease to exist, eventually resulting in the decay of all protons, and therefore even atoms will cease to exist.

The Black Hole Era will take over at which point they are the only thing that remains (including the odd Neutrino blasting into nowhere).

At some point in time even the Black Holes will all evaporate, at which point complete heat death of the Universe will have occurred.

The timespan of the stelliferous era able to support life as we know it is unimaginably short compared to the other eras.

The point Paleo is making is that even our Universe's ability to support life is for a mere blip compared to its entire existence.
This is just one perspective. Not the only perspective.

You are a complete faaaking idiot!  No, an embarrassment to idiots every where.
Why is it so?
~Julius Sumner Miller
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 9:32 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 9:22 pm)Ahriman Wrote: My own personal cosmology works pretty well too. You just gotta believe.

Why should we believe your cosmology as opposed to someone else's?

P.S.  Sometimes I get the impression that you are just a troll, and are not a serious participant of this community.
My cosmology is very unique, maybe it wouldn't get critical acclaim.
"Imagination, life is your creation"
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
You guys are wasting your time with airhead. Stupid is infinitely more intelligent than airhead.
Why is it so?
~Julius Sumner Miller
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 9:22 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 9:10 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Because it works.
My own personal cosmology works pretty well too. You just gotta believe.

Just like throwing feces work for monkeys, or drink works for the drunk.
Reply
RE: The Ownership of Science
(November 3, 2021 at 9:35 pm)Spongebob Wrote:
(November 3, 2021 at 8:51 pm)Ahriman Wrote: This is just one perspective. Not the only perspective.

You are a complete faaaking idiot!  No, an embarrassment to idiots every where.
Shill for science harder.
"Imagination, life is your creation"
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science FifthElement 23 8463 June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Rahul
  Science Laughs: Science Comedian Brian Malow orogenicman 4 4493 December 10, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Lethe



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)