Names of places in Croatia

[FlatAssembler]

But you know that's all a lie, bacause of p values.  Quick question, what's the p value of a bigoted militant getting maimed by 5.56?

Like I've said, I have no idea how to calculate the p-value for those things. I only think I found a way to estimate the confidence interval of the p-value of that k-r pattern in the Croatian river names, by measuring collision entropy and doing birthday calculations. I think the p-value of that k-r pattern in Croatian river names is between 1/300 and 1/17.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

But you know that's all a lie, bacause of p values.  Quick question, what's the p value of a bigoted militant getting maimed by 5.56?

Like I've said, I have no idea how to calculate the p-value for those things. I only think I found a way to estimate the confidence interval of the p-value of that k-r pattern in the Croatian river names, by measuring collision entropy and doing birthday calculations. I think the p-value of that k-r pattern in Croatian river names is between 1/300 and 1/17.

Can you calculate the p-value for sarcasm?

Boru

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

260/261 victims does not constitute genocide - your countrymen who brought the suit got it wrong.

No one accused you of breaking any laws. I’m accusing you of being an imbecile.

Boru

As far as I understand it, the mainstream history claims that around 3'000 people were killed at Vukovar (around 1'700 Serbians and 1'300 Croatians), Vukovar Massacre itself accounting for less that 10% of that number. Serbian historians often claim it's even more, that the number of Serbians who were killed in Vukovar is around 50% higher.

I said that either 260 or 261 people were killed in the Vukovar Massacre. 260 is less than 10% of 3000. 

Why are you telling me what I just said?

Boru

[FlatAssembler]

As far as I understand it, the mainstream history claims that around 3'000 people were killed at Vukovar (around 1'700 Serbians and 1'300 Croatians), Vukovar Massacre itself accounting for less that 10% of that number. Serbian historians often claim it's even more, that the number of Serbians who were killed in Vukovar is around 50% higher.

I said that either 260 or 261 people were killed in the Vukovar Massacre. 260 is less than 10% of 3000. 

Why are you telling me what I just said?

Boru

Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. You said that Croatians are wrong to claim what supposedly happened at Vukovar was a genocide because only 260 people died there, and 260 people are not enough to make a genocide, right? Well, according to the mainstream history, there were actually thousands of people who died at Vukovar.

[arewethereyet]

I said that either 260 or 261 people were killed in the Vukovar Massacre. 260 is less than 10% of 3000. 

Why are you telling me what I just said?

Boru

Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. You said that Croatians are wrong to claim what supposedly happened at Vukovar was a genocide because only 260 people died there, and 260 people are not enough to make a genocide, right? Well, according to the mainstream history, there were actually thousands of people who died at Vukovar.

Just a guess but I bet people are still dying there, whatever the reason.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I said that either 260 or 261 people were killed in the Vukovar Massacre. 260 is less than 10% of 3000. 

Why are you telling me what I just said?

Boru

Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. You said that Croatians are wrong to claim what supposedly happened at Vukovar was a genocide because only 260 people died there, and 260 people are not enough to make a genocide, right? Well, according to the mainstream history, there were actually thousands of people who died at Vukovar.

Thousands DID die at the Battle of Vukovar. The Vukovar Massacre was the slaughter of 260 Croatian POWs that occurred after the Battle.

Boru

[FlatAssembler]

Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. You said that Croatians are wrong to claim what supposedly happened at Vukovar was a genocide because only 260 people died there, and 260 people are not enough to make a genocide, right? Well, according to the mainstream history, there were actually thousands of people who died at Vukovar.

Thousands DID die at the Battle of Vukovar. The Vukovar Massacre was the slaughter of 260 Croatian POWs that occurred after the Battle.

Boru

So, thousands of people supposedly killed due to ethnic cleansing does not constitute a genocide?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Thousands DID die at the Battle of Vukovar. The Vukovar Massacre was the slaughter of 260 Croatian POWs that occurred after the Battle.

Boru

So, thousands of people supposedly killed due to ethnic cleansing does not constitute a genocide?

It probably does. But you referred specifically to the Vukovar Massacre as a genocide. 260 victims do not a genocide make. A war crime, yes. A genocide, no.

You do understand that the Battle of Vukovar and the Vukovar Massacre refer to two different (but linked) events, right?

Boru

[FlatAssembler]

So, thousands of people supposedly killed due to ethnic cleansing does not constitute a genocide?

It probably does. But you referred specifically to the Vukovar Massacre as a genocide. 260 victims do not a genocide make. A war crime, yes. A genocide, no.

You do understand that the Battle of Vukovar and the Vukovar Massacre refer to two different (but linked) events, right?

Boru

I understand that. I simply thought that, on this forum, Vukovar Massacre is referred to as "the genocide in living memory".

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

It probably does. But you referred specifically to the Vukovar Massacre as a genocide. 260 victims do not a genocide make. A war crime, yes. A genocide, no.

You do understand that the Battle of Vukovar and the Vukovar Massacre refer to two different (but linked) events, right?

Boru

I understand that. I simply thought that, on this forum, Vukovar Massacre is referred to as "the genocide in living memory".

You're the only one who referred to it as that. Wrongly.

Boru