I suddenly have to P.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 6:17 am
Thread Rating:
[Serious] Quantum v. Classical computing.
|
(May 20, 2022 at 5:18 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(May 20, 2022 at 4:38 pm)highdimensionman Wrote: Photonic Quantum computing already can beat a classical computer at few very specific tasks. https://www.livescience.com/china-quantu...emacy.html (May 20, 2022 at 11:10 pm)highdimensionman Wrote:(May 20, 2022 at 5:18 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Can you provide a reference for photonic quantum computers outperforming a classical one? I can't find anything on this. From the article, "Neither would be particularly useful on its own as a computer, and the Chinese device was built to solve just one type of problem." Not much of a computer that can only solve one type of problem. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Will quantum computers slow our Internet down? | FlatAssembler | 5 | 450 |
November 16, 2023 at 3:42 pm Last Post: Ravenshire |
|
Is Firefox quantum really better than Google Chrome? | ErGingerbreadMandude | 19 | 3105 |
November 19, 2017 at 2:31 am Last Post: Ravenshire |
|
What's the Deal with Virtual Computing? | AFTT47 | 3 | 986 |
May 3, 2015 at 5:54 am Last Post: bennyboy |
|
quantum computers | simplexity | 1 | 1005 |
July 6, 2013 at 3:27 am Last Post: Kayenneh |
|
Cloud computing | Zen Badger | 18 | 4569 |
March 13, 2013 at 6:30 pm Last Post: Jackalope |
|
Progress towards quantum computing? | popeyespappy | 0 | 884 |
October 7, 2011 at 12:15 am Last Post: popeyespappy |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)