Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 6:47 am
Thread Rating:
Kant's imperative is good
|
(June 11, 2022 at 2:45 am)Interaktive Wrote:(June 10, 2022 at 2:58 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Thanks, Interaktive. Is Ukrainian your native language?No, I am German Not to worry - your English is better than my German. Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Jurisprudence, biology, physics, chemistry, is antireligion
(July 21, 2022 at 10:58 pm)Jehanne Wrote: It might be helpful to use Google Translate: Too not everytime understand
I'm sorry for my elementary english
RE: Kant's imperative is good
July 22, 2022 at 6:02 am
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2022 at 6:08 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(June 11, 2022 at 8:49 am)Jehanne Wrote:(June 10, 2022 at 7:56 am)Interaktive Wrote: bible is bad I also have a lot of issues with Kant’s moral imperative. Must be my utilitarian upbringing. The most well known objection is the ‘lying to a murderer’ scenario: Joe comes to you and says, ‘I’m going to murder Jim. Tell me where he is.’ In order to obey Kantian hypothetical moral imperatives (because they require truth-telling to be a universal obligation), you’d have to give up this information. As a utilitarian (greatest good for the greatest number), you have a moral obligation to lie to Joe to save Jim’s life and to keep Joe from going to prison for murder. Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
If you don't like the fish, try the vodka.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)