Sudan

[WinterHold]

The war-mongering, Muslim-hating, militia-backing US Special Forces have successfully evacuated American personnel from their embassy in Khartoum, completely failing to slaughter any Sudanese people in the process.

Sorry, Winter.

Boru

That's the "official" news.
Implicitly, America is a superpower and a master of proxy warfare.

Is Daglo its proxy in Africa?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

The war-mongering, Muslim-hating, militia-backing US Special Forces have successfully evacuated American personnel from their embassy in Khartoum, completely failing to slaughter any Sudanese people in the process.

Sorry, Winter.

Boru

That's the "official" news.
Implicitly, America is a superpower and a master of proxy warfare.

Is Daglo its proxy in Africa?

It seems hugely unlikely, for a few reasons:

-The US has reasons (some good, some not so good) for the actions they take. There doesn’t seem to be any particular US interest that would be served by supporting the RSF over the SAF.

-Dagalo (personally) and the RSF have both been sanctioned by the US, which seems an odd thing to do if you want to use them topple the Sudanese government.

-There are strong ties - in weapons, training, security, and logistical support - between the RSF and the Wagner Group. If the US was using the RSF as a proxy, it would be seen as directly supporting the Wagners.

Boru

[Thumpalumpacus]

Just like America robbed Iraq out of its oil, Afghanistan out of its Uranium and wealth, they are doing the same to Sudan by a proxy like Daglo.

*yawn*

If you're worried about Africa being exploited, you'd be smarter to be wary of China, which has about nine times the investments on the continent than America.

But that doesn't fit your "America is the source of all evil" narrative, so China gets a pass from you even as they're screwing over a billion Africans.

[WinterHold]

That's the "official" news.
Implicitly, America is a superpower and a master of proxy warfare.

Is Daglo its proxy in Africa?

It seems hugely unlikely, for a few reasons:

-The US has reasons (some good, some not so good) for the actions they take. There doesn’t seem to be any particular US interest that would be served by supporting the RSF over the SAF.

-Dagalo (personally) and the RSF have both been sanctioned by the US, which seems an odd thing to do if you want to use them topple the Sudanese government.

-There are strong ties - in weapons, training, security, and logistical support - between the RSF and the Wagner Group. If the US was using the RSF as a proxy, it would be seen as directly supporting the Wagners.

Boru

Sucking natural resources is enough for the U.S to be present in wealthy regions.
Without such interventions; the U.S won't have wealth to finance its wars such as the war in Ukraine.

China and Russia are as brutal and parasitic as the U.S intelligence agency, all of the 3 practice chopping weaker nations to thrive.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

It seems hugely unlikely, for a few reasons:

-The US has reasons (some good, some not so good) for the actions they take. There doesn’t seem to be any particular US interest that would be served by supporting the RSF over the SAF.

-Dagalo (personally) and the RSF have both been sanctioned by the US, which seems an odd thing to do if you want to use them topple the Sudanese government.

-There are strong ties - in weapons, training, security, and logistical support - between the RSF and the Wagner Group. If the US was using the RSF as a proxy, it would be seen as directly supporting the Wagners.

Boru

Sucking natural resources is enough for the U.S to be present in wealthy regions.
Without such interventions; the U.S won't have wealth to finance its wars such as the war in Ukraine.

China and Russia are as brutal and parasitic as the U.S intelligence agency, all of the 3 practice chopping weaker nations to thrive.

None of which explains why the US would support a Russia-linked paramilitary group over a friendly Sudanese government.

Boru

[Thumpalumpacus]

Without such interventions; the U.S won't have wealth to finance its wars such as the war in Ukraine.

That isn't an American war.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Without such interventions; the U.S won't have wealth to finance its wars such as the war in Ukraine.

That isn't an American war.

Winter remains convinced - despite both the lack of evidence and overwhelming evidence to the contrary - that the US is behind every armed conflict anywhere in the world. This is because Winter is very stupid.

Boru

[Thumpalumpacus]

That isn't an American war.

Winter remains convinced - despite both the lack of evidence and overwhelming evidence to the contrary - that the US is behind every armed conflict anywhere in the world. This is because Winter is very stupid.

Boru

Right, which is why I needled him about it in his birthday whinefest.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Sucking natural resources is enough for the U.S to be present in wealthy regions.

Bullshit 

Without such interventions; the U.S won't have wealth to finance its wars such as the war in Ukraine.

Bullshit America doesn't require interventions to be wealthy in fact interventions cost more then they ever give in return and Ukraine isn't  an American War. 

China and Russia are as brutal and parasitic as the U.S intelligence agency, all of the 3 practice chopping weaker nations to thrive.

Bullshit China and Russia make America look like a cute cuddly puppy the Wagner group alone are more brutal ,heartless and outright evil then any modern American fighting force. So this false comparison is nonsense. America will  build a dunken donuts . Russia and China will build a forced labor camp.