Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 18, 2024, 12:28 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 30, 2023 at 12:16 am)Jackalope Wrote:
(October 29, 2023 at 5:12 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Three mass shootings in the US today, making 564 this year. How is that ‘very rare’?

Boru

I wonder, how many would constitute a problem that we should, you know, do something about?

That is like asking how high somebody's body temperature has to be before you try bloodletting. You should not try bloodletting until you have solid mechanistic evidence that it works. Similarly, you should not try banning high-tech weapons and preventing mentally ill people from owning a firearm (which is what "gun control" essentially means) before you have solid mechanistic evidence that it would do anything to decrease mass shootings.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Bloodletting???

Is there anyone left here who doubts that FlatAss is a troll?
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 30, 2023 at 10:30 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(October 30, 2023 at 12:16 am)Jackalope Wrote: I wonder, how many would constitute a problem that we should, you know, do something about?

That is like asking how high somebody's body temperature has to be before you try bloodletting. You should not try bloodletting until you have solid mechanistic evidence that it works. Similarly, you should not try banning high-tech weapons and preventing mentally ill people from owning a firearm (which is what "gun control" essentially means) before you have solid mechanistic evidence that it would do anything to decrease mass shootings.

Here’s your solid, mechanistic evidence:

-Countries with the strictest gun control measures have the lowest incidence of gun violence.

-Countries with the loosest gun control measures have the highest incidence of gun violence.

Now, get back under your bridge and wait for the goats.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 30, 2023 at 10:30 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(October 30, 2023 at 12:16 am)Jackalope Wrote: I wonder, how many would constitute a problem that we should, you know, do something about?

That is like asking how high somebody's body temperature has to be before you try bloodletting. You should not try bloodletting until you have solid mechanistic evidence that it works. Similarly, you should not try banning high-tech weapons and preventing mentally ill people from owning a firearm (which is what "gun control" essentially means) before you have solid mechanistic evidence that it would do anything to decrease mass shootings.

Congratulations, you've deflected on the question just like every other delusional gun nut before you, as expected.

We do have such evidence. I suggest you spend more time looking at the issue objectively and less time thinking up absurd analogies and fellating Kleck.

(Before you ask, no, I am not here to do work for you.)

ETA: I also note that you immediately jumped to the conclusion that "doing something about it" == "gun control". I suggested no such thing. The question was crystal clear as asked as was your deflection.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 30, 2023 at 12:16 am)Jackalope Wrote:
(October 29, 2023 at 5:12 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Three mass shootings in the US today, making 564 this year. How is that ‘very rare’?

Boru

I wonder, how many would constitute a problem that we should, you know, do something about?

Maybe when the mass shooters start putting Republican politicians, their kids, NRA executives, and their kids are in the target groups, we'll finally see something accomplished.

I'm not holding my breath that either the Reps or the Dems will ever actually do anything other than make comforting sounds over the corpses of the innocent.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 30, 2023 at 10:30 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(October 30, 2023 at 12:16 am)Jackalope Wrote: I wonder, how many would constitute a problem that we should, you know, do something about?

That is like asking how high somebody's body temperature has to be before you try bloodletting. You should not try bloodletting until you have solid mechanistic evidence that it works. Similarly, you should not try banning high-tech weapons and preventing mentally ill people from owning a firearm (which is what "gun control" essentially means) before you have solid mechanistic evidence that it would do anything to decrease mass shootings.

Does your ass ever get jealous of all the shit that comes out of your mouth?!?

Just curious.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
I’m still trying to grasp why he thinks mental illnesses, including (I presume) things like PTSD, paranoia, and antisocial personality disorder should NOT be a bar to carrying a gun.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Well I'm not crazy enough to want to own a gun!
The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.

Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!

Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
‘Carrying a gun is an invitation for someone to shoot you.’ - Atticus Finch

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
What do you think about Israel loosening its gun control laws in response to terrorist attacks? https://youtu.be/g9fKK_9zVdg?si=_G4L07-H9qUZNfup
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Google's Mobile-Friendly Test Driving Me Batty: What am I Doing Wrong? Rhondazvous 10 3135 August 14, 2015 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Reading redefined! Napoléon 31 4085 April 18, 2014 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: NoraBrimstone
  Please give me link voting english website A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c 4 1748 December 24, 2013 at 2:29 am
Last Post: A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c
  Idea for a service / business. Tiberius 3 1463 April 27, 2012 at 5:17 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Prof. Alan Woodward is Wrong; The Internet is Fine Tiberius 14 5834 March 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)