Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 9:16 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Macroevolution
#21
RE: Macroevolution
(May 7, 2011 at 1:49 am)Godschild Wrote: I do not even visit christian forums.

So you think that hanging around atheists is cooler.

hmm....
[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Reply
#22
RE: Macroevolution
The only difference between micro and macro-evolution is time.
undefined
Reply
#23
RE: Macroevolution
G-C is still demanding to see a Crocoduck.

Nuance is lost on xtians.
Reply
#24
RE: Macroevolution
Afterall, evolution is the only game in town...
Reply
#25
RE: Macroevolution
Well...when compared to your fucking god playing in the dirt, yeah. It is.
Reply
#26
RE: Macroevolution
(May 7, 2011 at 2:13 am)Minimalist Wrote: No. As usual you have no fucking clue what the point is.

He completely missed it didn't he?
I swear he's doing this intentionally!
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
#27
RE: Macroevolution
(May 7, 2011 at 12:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Well...when compared to your fucking god playing in the dirt, yeah. It is.

But that's not a good analogy because He doesn't literally play in the dirt. He made us out of dirt (i.e. from the minerals and chemicals in it) and this doesn't exclude other ingredients of life such as water. And evolution can still happen that way.
Reply
#28
RE: Macroevolution
(May 7, 2011 at 12:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Well...when compared to your fucking god playing in the dirt, yeah. It is.

hahaha, Oh you blissfully ignorant old codger, you.
Reply
#29
RE: Macroevolution
(May 7, 2011 at 1:12 pm)Rayaan Wrote:
(May 7, 2011 at 12:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Well...when compared to your fucking god playing in the dirt, yeah. It is.

But that's not a good analogy because He doesn't literally play in the dirt. He made us out of dirt (i.e. from the minerals and chemicals in it) and this doesn't exclude other ingredients of life such as water. And evolution can still happen that way.


Oh, great. Dirt + water = mud.

Big improvement.



(May 7, 2011 at 1:58 pm)Watson Wrote:
(May 7, 2011 at 12:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Well...when compared to your fucking god playing in the dirt, yeah. It is.

hahaha, Oh you blissfully ignorant old codger, you.


Blow god out your ass, boy.

Reply
#30
RE: Macroevolution
It's not supposed to be an exact analogy, Godschild. It attempts to demonstrate that repeated instances of microevolution eventually add up to macroevolution, along with a few other more nuanced points which I doubt you'd understand. Your argument is akin to saying that our theory of motion is incorrect because it's always the same matter. All you're doing is demonstrating your lack of intelligence.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)