Posts: 1994
Threads: 161
Joined: August 17, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Macroevolution
May 7, 2011 at 7:57 am
The only difference between micro and macro-evolution is time.
undefined
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Macroevolution
May 7, 2011 at 11:23 am
G-C is still demanding to see a Crocoduck.
Nuance is lost on xtians.
Posts: 1091
Threads: 18
Joined: January 26, 2010
Reputation:
13
RE: Macroevolution
May 7, 2011 at 12:22 pm
Afterall, evolution is the only game in town...
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Macroevolution
May 7, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Well...when compared to your fucking god playing in the dirt, yeah. It is.
Posts: 3872
Threads: 39
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
43
RE: Macroevolution
May 7, 2011 at 1:00 pm
(May 7, 2011 at 2:13 am)Minimalist Wrote: No. As usual you have no fucking clue what the point is.
He completely missed it didn't he?
I swear he's doing this intentionally!
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Posts: 14
Threads: 1
Joined: May 7, 2011
Reputation:
0
RE: Macroevolution
May 8, 2011 at 2:44 pm
It's not supposed to be an exact analogy, Godschild. It attempts to demonstrate that repeated instances of microevolution eventually add up to macroevolution, along with a few other more nuanced points which I doubt you'd understand. Your argument is akin to saying that our theory of motion is incorrect because it's always the same matter. All you're doing is demonstrating your lack of intelligence.