PETA facts

[Autumnlicious]

I found the last bit about her being sterile and opposing giving birth to be superfluous.

Plenty of people oppose population expansion. And there are plenty of sterile people.

Let's not soil their good name with the shit of Peta.

[Judas BentHer]

PETA Thinks These Pit Bulls Should Die
July 18, 2011 by Robert Pregulman (Article)

PETA Employees Face 31 Felony Animal-Cruelty Charges for Killing, Dumping Dogs (2005 Article)
**And in the end what were Andrew and Adria found guilty of ? Littering! (Article)

Being a 501c3 tax exempt organization, PeTA is prohibited from lobbying for change in animal welfare. What they do instead, and that's even questionable by IRS reg's., is send out "Alerts" to members, about animal welfare issues they need to address.
Bad thing about that is, PeTA lies! They distort facts, all to inflame the membership who are already inflamed about the issue of animal cruelty and exploitation. Which PeTA knows and exploits in it's own right. And every alert is accompanied with a begging box wherein PeTA asks for money so as to continue it's mission addressing that particular issue (in the alert) and others as well.

There's a reason the "e" for ethical is lower case and slanted.

“Even if animal tests produced a cure for AIDS, we'd be against it.” PETA president and co-founder Ingrid Newkirk, in the September 1989 issue of Vogue

It's a beautiful thing that bitch is sterile. Her psychotic DNA dies with her.

[MilesTailsPrower]

I am a cat.

I hate you

[Judas BentHer]

Imagine the hairballs.

[MilesTailsPrower]

My family used to drown cats on a farm...?

[Judas BentHer]

Oh hell, I hope that's not true.

[MilesTailsPrower]

Lol I hope it's not true either...? I wasn't there at the time.

[theVOID]

There was a PETA affiliate here last year who was complaining about sterilizing animals, they broke the windows of a Vet's clinic, worse still was the fact that this Vet provided animal sterilizations for FREE - People who offer those services are doing far more to help the animal cruelty than the cunts at PETA, limiting the number of animals clearly means that the animals who are living receive better care, a function of the ratio between animals and the number of people who would be willing to care for them.

Hell, these assholes probably put down more animals than the Animal Control center who's job it is to put down dangerous/sick animals and get the healthy ones adopted.

[Judas BentHer]

PeTA's leadership are the type that remind me of Contrarian disorder. Supposedly this is a mental illness that causes the sufferer to adopt the contrary position of society, someone they're in dialog with, etc...
For instance, if I say to a Contrarian; I enjoy walks by the ocean. The contrarian will remark in return; I hate the ocean. I'd rather stroll by a lake.

PeTA, while their mission statement appears to indicate compassion and activism directed toward insuring the ethical treatment of animals, practices the exact opposite. They're not able to pursue lobbying for their cause, due to their 501c3 tax exempt status. And we all know their ethics are in the gutter, when it comes to animals. So what's their point?
Inflaming a gullible yet compassionate animal loving public, for profit. Even though their tax status implies they are a not for profit fraudulent organization.

But what a lucrative fraudulent pursuit it is. They have an operating budget I can't even begin to imagine and offices throughout the world.
And yet in their history, there is not one law regarding animal welfare that has ever been passed through the concerted investment of PeTA resources. Which is understandable given, again, their tax exempt restrictions to that effect. However, one would think an organization dedicated to animal welfare would not seek to be tax exempt so that they could retain lobbyists and fight for lawful protections and ethical treatment of animals.

PeTA, for quite some time, has been on the FBI and NSA terrorist watch list. Not only because of the level of membership they solicit, but because a large portion of their tax exempt donations go to fund "ALF" (Animal Liberation Front). Terrorists, by every description afforded the word.

It's an amazing thing, how love of animals will incite people to join an organization they don't truly know even the basics about. Celebrity endorsements aren't necessarily a reflection of anything different about that. PeTA has gone on the record and said they're exhibitionists and will do anything to remain relevant in the press. They solicit main stream popular celebrities in order to keep that priority current.
Meanwhile plastic Barbie's like Pam "I'll marry just to repay gambling debts" Anderson, would rather go naked than wear fur. While no doubt if she loves animals she's just another blond joke that has no idea how many pets PeTA murders every year. Not that it's hard to find, given 501c3 organizations like PeTA's documents are a matter of public record.
And besides, any self respecting Mink that's seen Pam without makeup would rather she simply remain clothed, while the animal simply runs faster and away from the traps.

---

And by the way Miles, thanks for the Rep. point. However, I love cats. I even have one or two. (Un-drowned, tyvm. )

[Tiberius]

I've seen most of this info before; I think Ryft shared it on facebook once.

One thing I don't get in this version is why the fact that the leader of Peta was sterilized is mentioned. It's her personal decision; if she doesn't want kids that's up to her. It's just a bit odd to have it right there at the end, unless the author was trying to imply she wanted it done to all humans, which as far as I am aware, is not the case.

Just noting that we should be wary of infographics that contain random bits of speculation. I'm sure (no, scratch that, I'm certain) that the rest of the poster is completely true, but I just don't see the point of having a really good campaign against Peta if we are going to make up lies about them as well.