Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 7:20 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SEX SEX SEX
#1
SEX SEX SEX
In a perfect world we
would all be bisexual and
there would be two advantages
to this : no homophobia and a reduced
world population - assuming that the ratio
between hetero and homosexual sex was the same
Men would fuck fewer women as they would have more
male partners and women would fuck fewer men as they would
have more female partners and the planet s natural resources would
last longer as the global birth rate would be significantly reduced as a result
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN
Reply
#2
RE: SEX SEX SEX
:blink-blink:

How the hell would being bisexual impact our world population at all? It isn't our sexual orientation that is responsible for us having children: it is that many of us want biological children in the first place.

What would be nice is if people didn't care that their children be biological. I've gone from an occasional maternal in the last month to a state of being excited for adopted children in my future... is not it a shame that many hold such excitement at the prospect of biological children instead? Heart
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#3
RE: SEX SEX SEX
There may be a cash prize for the person who makes a Chrome extension removing line breaks from twocompulsive's posts.

Anyway, I don't think it would reduce the population, people would just have more sex.
Reply
#4
RE: SEX SEX SEX
(November 9, 2011 at 12:36 pm)edk141 Wrote: Anyway, I don't think it would reduce the population, people would just have more sex.

Which would also help create a more ideal world. Big Grin
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#5
RE: SEX SEX SEX
If everyone was bisexual wouldnt there just be more choice of partners?

teenage me wouldve be turned down by twice as many people.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#6
RE: SEX SEX SEX
But crucially, I don't want a dick in my ass.
Reply
#7
RE: SEX SEX SEX
I like being "strictly dickly". I don't get along with most women.
42

Reply
#8
RE: SEX SEX SEX
I don't see how if the whole world was bisexual we would have lower birthrates.

A man can impregnate multiple women within days apart.
A woman can only get pregnant from 1 man every 9 months of a successful child birth.

Make America Great Again! Trump 2020
Reply
#9
RE: SEX SEX SEX
I wouldn't like a bisexual world, it's nice having diversity as we are, everyone being the same would be meh.
Reply
#10
RE: SEX SEX SEX
(November 9, 2011 at 11:43 am)twocompulsive Wrote: In a perfect world we
would all be bisexual and
there would be two advantages
to this : no homophobia and a reduced
world population - assuming that the ratio
between hetero and homosexual sex was the same
Men would fuck fewer women as they would have more
male partners and women would fuck fewer men as they would
have more female partners and the planet s natural resources would
last longer as the global birth rate would be significantly reduced as a result

I do believe that a lot of humans are bisexual to some degree or another (culture has more of than influence on people's behavior than you think). Few people would be exclusively heterosexual or homosexual. Our closest relatives Bonobo Chimps are bisexual by the way.

Although if we had widespread bisexual and promiscuous behavior, our family structures would change, into one one where the mother's brothers fill the "father" role. There are societies like that where people don't know who the kids biological fathers are a lot of the time, so their uncles become the "father" figure.

However I don't think it would effect the birthrate very much although.
undefined
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)