Posts: 948
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 10, 2015 at 11:51 pm
(January 10, 2015 at 11:45 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (January 10, 2015 at 9:17 pm)snowtracks Wrote: not looking for excuses; perhaps you don't understand the assignment.
It's not an excuse, you dismissive ass; the first cells do not have to be the same as modern cells. That's kinda what the evolutionary model is all about, change over time. Just because you baselessly assert that cells never change, solely because it's convenient to your argument, doesn't make Rhythm's answer an excuse. It just makes you ignorant.
As if your insistence on using nothing but arguments from ignorance wasn't enough hint of that.  the first cell, with the first protective barrier is the question. what's with this modern cell business?
Atheist Credo: An universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 10, 2015 at 11:55 pm
(January 10, 2015 at 11:51 pm)snowtracks Wrote: the first cell, with the first protective barrier is the question. what's with this modern cell business?
Still just assuming your conclusion, that the first cell and the first protective barrier developed at the same time, then?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 10, 2015 at 11:55 pm
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2015 at 11:56 pm by dyresand.)
(January 10, 2015 at 11:51 pm)snowtracks Wrote: (January 10, 2015 at 11:45 pm)Esquilax Wrote: It's not an excuse, you dismissive ass; the first cells do not have to be the same as modern cells. That's kinda what the evolutionary model is all about, change over time. Just because you baselessly assert that cells never change, solely because it's convenient to your argument, doesn't make Rhythm's answer an excuse. It just makes you ignorant.
As if your insistence on using nothing but arguments from ignorance wasn't enough hint of that. the first cell, with the first protective barrier is the question. what's with this modern cell business?
The better question would be to ask what came first the chicken or the egg? once you figure that out you figured out reproduction. I already know the answer.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 11, 2015 at 2:51 am
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Posts: 30681
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 11, 2015 at 2:53 am
(January 11, 2015 at 2:51 am)IATIA Wrote:
...leaving the chicken quite unsatisfied.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 11, 2015 at 4:28 am
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2015 at 4:30 am by robvalue.)
God has no explanatory power. It does not tell us how things were created, if they were at all, it just puts a label on the mystery. And the label is a bigger mystery than the mystery it is supposed to solve.
If you think there are only two possibilities, that either current scientific models can explain absolutely everything, or else a God did it, that is what's called a false dichotomy. You are ignoring an infinity of other explanations which also have no basis, along with the possibility that science is yet to find out. Or maybe science can't find out the answers entirely, some things may be beyond it's scope, but that lends no credibility to other unsupported explanations. Or the possibility that you don't understand very much about science and aren't interested in filling the gaps in your knowledge. It seems you think these gaps are convenient for your argument and can extend them to other people too.
I'm a BITCH today. Sorry about that. I could be on next top model. I hope all my arguments today have been to the point and not personally insulting.
Posts: 13900
Threads: 262
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 11, 2015 at 6:34 am
(January 10, 2015 at 11:55 pm)dyresand Wrote: (January 10, 2015 at 11:51 pm)snowtracks Wrote: the first cell, with the first protective barrier is the question. what's with this modern cell business?
The better question would be to ask what came first the chicken or the egg? once you figure that out you figured out reproduction. I already know the answer.
An egg and a chicken were in bed together.
The egg took a drag on a post coital cigarette.
"well that answers that" said the egg.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 11, 2015 at 7:07 am
They both came first. Because I said so.
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 11, 2015 at 7:16 pm
(January 10, 2015 at 8:05 pm)IATIA Wrote: You are either not reading posts and links or you are just being stubborn and obtuse for the hell of it. Par for the course. At some point it seems that the pure fundie types get flustered enough by our unwillingness to accept presuppositions as "evidence/proof/truth" that they give up trying and start flinging random bits of poo at the wall.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 948
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
January 12, 2015 at 8:16 pm
(January 11, 2015 at 7:16 pm)Tonus Wrote: (January 10, 2015 at 8:05 pm)IATIA Wrote: You are either not reading posts and links or you are just being stubborn and obtuse for the hell of it. Par for the course. At some point it seems that the pure fundie types get flustered enough by our unwillingness to accept presuppositions as "evidence/proof/truth" that they give up trying and start flinging random bits of poo at the wall. Have stated this before, but it may need to be reiterated. Seems like you laboring under the grand illusion (perhaps even delusion) that I’m trying to prove, persuade, cajole or influence board members to believe in God’s existence or change their worldview to a creation model. Only God can prove God which has all ready been done. Everyone thinks there is a God, some will say ‘there is no God’; human were made in His image, that imprint can’t be erased no matter how hard someone tries.
Why I am posting is: to give the christian old earth perspective. Notice the period at the end of previous sentence. God made the garden-of-eden every good, and then may it even better by introducing ‘free-will’. Think about it, if God gave people free will to choice, I should and do fully endorse the exercise thereof. So if there are atheist, so be it.
Atheist Credo: An universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
|
