RE: Apologetics open challenge
July 23, 2015 at 7:36 am
(This post was last modified: July 23, 2015 at 7:38 am by robvalue.)
That is called special pleading. "Just always there" isn't a valid explanation. I can say the universe was "just always there". You haven't got any information at all about whatever creator this is, so to talk about the infinite nature of his past is rather presumptuous. You are simply assuming there must be something behind it all, and defining it in any way you like to try and make it fit. It doesn't mean it's even possible such a thing exists.
I think I'll bring this to a close as we don't seem to be able to reach any agreement here. If you have anything new MK then feel free to bring it along. Or if anyone wants to chime on whether or not this is special pleading, feel free. Otherwise I'll leave it for the readers to decide.
Anyone else want to have a try? Don't be shy. Stroll right up and test your logic.
I think I'll bring this to a close as we don't seem to be able to reach any agreement here. If you have anything new MK then feel free to bring it along. Or if anyone wants to chime on whether or not this is special pleading, feel free. Otherwise I'll leave it for the readers to decide.
Anyone else want to have a try? Don't be shy. Stroll right up and test your logic.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum