(March 17, 2016 at 1:44 pm)drfuzzy Wrote:(March 17, 2016 at 1:30 pm)Drich Wrote: Apparently you do not value truth and research as you pretend to..
Your research always seems to come from religious sources. They start with a belief, and then throw anything in there (mostly lies and misinterpretations) to fit their belief and then hold it up as proof. They can be easily dismissed as anti-intellectual and not real research.
Philosophy is like being in a dark room and looking for a black cat.
Metaphysics is like being in a dark room and looking for a black cat that isn't there.
Theology is like being in a dark room and looking for a black cat that isn't there, and shouting "I found it!" -- after having thrown a flashlight in the trash.
Science is like being in a dark room and looking for a black cat using a flash light.
Hey, sport...
Truth is Truth despite the source.
Do you know what small minds do when they can not refute the truth? They attack the messenger. When you see one side of an argument switch from the subject being discussed, to that person attack the messenger (Ad Hom attack) they can be identified as a 'limited thinker/small minded person."
My source that identified the Asiatics (in your post) as being Semitic speaking people was the Encyclopedia Britannica. Maybe you just too young to remember what the E/B was.. It was 'Google' before their was Google on everything science. Hardly a religious source.
And speaking of my sources I Rarly if EVER quote a religious source unless it specifically deals with a Religious topic and can not be honorably be sourced any other way.
So looks like your FAIL was complete.