RE: The nature of evidence
May 3, 2016 at 2:27 am
(This post was last modified: May 3, 2016 at 2:28 am by robvalue.)
Indeed. I'd put the word games into the "arguments without evidence" category. Talking instead of producing.
It seems to me, at least on this forum, the most common goal is to "win the argument". That means continuing endlessly, dodging and weaving and bullshitting, until the atheist gets tired of it. Then "they win". What exactly they win, I don't know. Maybe another blowjob from Jesus in the future.
It seems to me, at least on this forum, the most common goal is to "win the argument". That means continuing endlessly, dodging and weaving and bullshitting, until the atheist gets tired of it. Then "they win". What exactly they win, I don't know. Maybe another blowjob from Jesus in the future.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum