(May 31, 2016 at 5:27 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: But unfortunately that approach doesn't work, because placing god outside nature, outside detection is admitting that there is nothing behind the claim, no evidence and no possibility of producing evidence (for if evidence of got were to appear, does anyone think.the religionists would keep calling him supernatural?). So instead all that's left to "prove" god is special pleading like "everthing must have a creator to exist. But not god because...look over there a flying monkey!"
Why you think that "god outside nature" is equal to "outside detection"? God chose and continues to choose to intervene in the natural world. You seem to think there is some kind of logical/metaphysical problem with that. There is not.
So, we are left with seeing God work in the world AND the natural theology arguments AND enjoying a rewarding Christian life AND personal relationship with God to support the premise: God exists.