(November 17, 2016 at 8:29 pm)The Joker Wrote: Now this post is not to prove which is True Atheism or Theism, but will be a comparison of the two.Given all the above the burning question is do you favour vertical or horizontal rock crushers?
If you want to disapprove God’s existence, you would have to a give a natural explanation (Naturalistic Evolution) on how everything came by chance and not designed by an Intelligent mind “God”.
If you want to prove God’s existence, you would have to prove that things cannot form by chance, in other words you would need to disapprove Naturalistic Evolution, which is the natural explanation of the existence of the universe and all living things.
Theistic Evolution- Is stupid, because we know that the Bible contradicts Evolution at all levels.
· The Easiest and simplest way to disapprove God’s existence is to Prove Evolution to be True.
On the other hand.
· The Easiest and simplest way to prove God’s existence is to Prove Evolution to be False.
Remember disapproving naturalistic evolution that is Biological Evolution and Big bang evolution, Proves God automatically, because it’s either we came here by chance or God created us. However, some atheists have argued for an eternal universe and contradicting the universally accepted and observable 2nd law of thermodynamics which in turn contradicts an eternal universe, but in which case we are only left with the Biological evolution and not the Big Bang Evolution. The eternal universe argument is not actually a sensible argument according to science. Proving the theory of evolution disapproves intelligent design and proves we came by chance.
I like a nice gravity feed myself but would value your opinion.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.