Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔

[I_am_not_mafia]

But scientists are also looking to disprove each other's theories and to make a break through in understanding. They can only do this if they have the evidence though. So if there was any evidence for what you posted, so-called secular scientists would be publishing it if they could and furthering their own careers.

Secular scientists always start from a godless naturalistic framework, whereas Creationist scientists start from Godly view of things and then on to natualistic view. So the two scientists are never going to unite. We will have to see both sides.

No, we only need to use the scientific method. As from your OP, observable evidence, testable and repeatable experiments, and falsifiable hypotheses.

Creationist scientists do not use the scientific method.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_science

In its ruling, the court wrote that for any theory to qualify as scientific, the theory must be tentative, and open to revision or abandonment as new facts come to light. It wrote that any methodology which begins with an immutable conclusion which cannot be revised or rejected, regardless of the evidence, is not a scientific theory. The court found that creation science does not culminate in conclusions formed from scientific inquiry, but instead begins with the conclusion, one taken from a literal wording of the Book of Genesis, and seeks only scientific evidence to support it.