(April 12, 2012 at 1:47 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: None of this implies one is "superior" to the other. Difference doesn't preclude equal treatment under the law. It doesn't preclude different sexual orientation. It doesn't preclude exceptions to the rule, androgyny or alternate sexual identity. It just is what it is.
Counter argument to everyone here losing their shit --
An aspect, or even original purpose, of this shit is to allow for people who do not meet the normal stereotypes:
- some girly acting guy wearing dresses
- some manly woman with no rack walking around w/o a top
- (insert anything that makes Republicans flee in terror)
And mutated the culture to "accept" them through asking everyone to quit insisting on Males Vrs Females...
At least, that's what I can figure out was the original goal. Not certain of what it is now.
In any case guys, calm the fuck down...
It's not like Sweden is flying out and cutting off people's balls.
(April 12, 2012 at 5:46 am)5thHorseman Wrote: If I go to a Swedish strip club and a gender neutral waves its neutralhood at me, ill fuck it up.
If that's a threat, then I hope you're promptly arrested and deported. It is your choice to attend that strip club, and unless another person infringes your freedom of movement, you can take your business elsewhere.
(April 12, 2012 at 5:46 am)5thHorseman Wrote: Thats so stupid, no one can ignore obvious differences. Good idea, clearly the wrong way about it.
That's right. Because such an initiative cannot be possibly rolled back if it fails, right? (Derp.)
(April 12, 2012 at 1:02 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I think Swedish men need to grow some balls.
I'm fairly certain a male Swede would laugh at your comment, considering from his perspective, you're from the land of Troglodytes-who-worship-man-child-God-and-hates-non-white-people and hence would have no legs to stand on.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
