RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 24, 2013 at 8:52 am
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2013 at 9:03 am by Love.)
(April 24, 2013 at 8:03 am)Rhythm Wrote: I would hope not, if there -was -, if we just figured the earth had given up her secrets once and for all along the lines of a single interpretation of the evidence that would be abandoning the very method used to reach that conclusion.
I sense another round of circles coming on.
The way I have interpreted your reply is as follows: the scientific method can ultimately never lead to a robust theory that is: (1) agreed upon by all scientists, and (2) immune from being disproved/superseded. If scientific evidence and established theories are ultimately open to interpretation, how can the ultimate scientific truth of the matter ever be established? Is it a case of scientific democracy where the minority interpretations of evidence are ridiculed in favour of the majority perception?