(May 28, 2013 at 4:39 am)Esquilax Wrote:It is not an assertion because it is supported by every event in this world(May 28, 2013 at 4:34 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: I already did, then you rejected my definition!!!
I said that a non-intelligent process must be outperformed by intelligence or else it is not on-intelligent.
Can you refute that, or at leas bring a counter example?
Assertions made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, "Scholar." To demand I prove wrong an assertion you haven't yet proved is just another argument from ignorance.
intelligent or not
I even made the task easier for you by not asking for a full proof, just one example.