RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
June 23, 2013 at 7:04 pm
(This post was last modified: June 23, 2013 at 7:19 pm by Alter2Ego.)
(June 14, 2013 at 4:58 am)orogenicman Wrote: The biologic theory of evolution is not a personal philosophy. It is a scientific theory that describes natural phenomena. Dismiss it at your own choosing, but that's on you, and no one else.ALTER2EGO -to- OROGENICMAN:
The fact that you believe the popular myth perpetuated by the lazy and uninformed that fossils show some kind of continuum consistently over time is rather sad and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the theory of evolution and a lack of basic understanding of modern biology. Of course there are gaps in the fossil record. Fossilization is the exception, not the rule.
You just don't get it; do you? A theory is merely an attempt at explaining why a phenomena occurred. Just because the word "theory" is preceded by the word "scientific," that does not change it from being just a theory.
Theories are never defined as facts. In the case of evolution, it attempts to explain why our planet has a variety of living creatures. The explanation it presents is that all creatures that have ever existed on earth evolved from a single "common ancestor." Too bad the fossils record debunks this claim.
If all creatures that have ever existed came from a common ancestor, the fossils should be overrun with examples of various creatures evolving into something entirely different. Yet, not one single bone has ever been found that supports this opinion. Instead, the fossils record is full of nothing but gaps.