(September 19, 2013 at 2:46 pm)Drich Wrote:(September 19, 2013 at 12:40 pm)Beta Ray Bill Wrote: Yeah, Drich, right.
Get a time machine. Go back to the year 1300 BCE and ask Moses if what you wrote is EXACTLY what the Jewish philosophy of creation means. Every word of it. He'd have you burned for blasphemy and make a "sweet savor unto the LORD." What you wrote is completely ad hoc. It was added only so the Bible could work with Evolution. There is not an ounce of verifiable truth to your ideas.
Geeze, it's like trying to teach a blind man to play Pictionary. I can draw the clearest picture over and over, but he'll never see it. Your problem, Drich, is that you're not blind, you just won't open your eyes.
Just incase you missed it the first time or maybe just incase you are praying that I do not understand the defination I posted here it is again:
In science and philosophy, ad hoc means the addition of extraneous hypotheses to a theory to save it from being falsified.
So now show me what I 'added' to make my work an 'ad hoc' theory.[/u]
Ok "ad hoc" "Ad loogie" "ad homim" "addaboy", whatever, still doesn't make invisible sky daddies real. Not yours not any.
