RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am)max-greece Wrote: "1. I have already proved that atheistic origin science is false.
Therefore "the God did nothing" assumption has already been proven false forever.
You cannot use dating beyond recorded history because you do not know what God did.
You have an assumption of no God that is already been proven false.
2. Radio carbon dating is inaccurate beyond several thousand years.
The reason is that the CO2 levels were much higher in the past (before the flood) so the technique is useless for dating back beyond the flood."
Could you point out those proofs - I appear to have missed them, silly me.
BTW - there was no flood.
Here is an article stating that CO2 levels were 20 times present levels in the past.
The article is incorrect about when that happened of course. But the evidence for much higher CO2 levels in the past is true. So if about 5000 years ago, CO2 levels were 20x todays levels, something would be measured as mush older.
The no God assumption has been proven false by this topic and the other topics I have posted.
You cannot use it for dating beyond recorded history.
No article attached.
No proof that dating is wrong.
Gracie,
We have tree rings that go back further than 6,000 years (9,000? from memory). No need to dispute radio-dating. Tree rings - about as basic as it gets.
