RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 9:56 am
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2013 at 10:07 am by Chas.)
(October 8, 2013 at 7:15 am)Esquilax Wrote: I assure you, you have not. You are simply too blinded by your faith in Religioustastic Originationatory Faithism. Your assumptions lead you away from the truth, which is that I have proved you wrong on every point you have ever made, now and in future.
She should join the Religioustastic Originationatory Faith League (ROFL).
(October 8, 2013 at 7:31 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am)Esquilax Wrote: There's no need to provide more proof, Max. I have already proved Grace wrong: her god does not exist. It has been proven false forever.
Here is a link to the article
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum...07_1.shtml
There are many more on the Internet.
You need to be specific about your supposed tree ring proof.
1. you have not proven the "no God" assumption true. It is impossible.
2. The topics I have posted prove the "no God" assumption false.
3. The "no God" assumption cannot be used beyond recorded history
"long-term reconstructions of atmospheric CO2 levels going back in time show that 500 million years ago atmospheric CO2 was some 20 times higher than present values."
500 million years ago, sweetie. The useful range of carbon dating is 40,000 years. Can you even read?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.