RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 4:36 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2014 at 4:47 am by robvalue.)
Appeals to incredulity, logical fallacy.
The thing is (borrowing from Matt Dillahunty) no one actually believes because of any of these arguments. They already believe for other reasons, and use them as rationalisations. I would find it hard to believe a single sane person was ever convinced to believe, without coercion, by any of this.
(Yes, indoctrination is coercion as well as child abuse. If you are for real here, you are almost certainly a victim of it, and for that I am sorry.)
The thing is (borrowing from Matt Dillahunty) no one actually believes because of any of these arguments. They already believe for other reasons, and use them as rationalisations. I would find it hard to believe a single sane person was ever convinced to believe, without coercion, by any of this.
(Yes, indoctrination is coercion as well as child abuse. If you are for real here, you are almost certainly a victim of it, and for that I am sorry.)
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
