RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 18, 2014 at 4:35 am
(This post was last modified: December 18, 2014 at 4:37 am by robvalue.)
I wonder if apologists could benefit from this line of thinking:
"Would I find it reasonable for me (the apologist) to be convicted of murder on the standard of evidence and arguments I am presenting? Are they that compelling and beyond reasonable doubt?"
If you have any doubts that it's up to this standard, then you need to reconsider your case. It's important to establish things, not just suggest possibilities.
"Would I find it reasonable for me (the apologist) to be convicted of murder on the standard of evidence and arguments I am presenting? Are they that compelling and beyond reasonable doubt?"
If you have any doubts that it's up to this standard, then you need to reconsider your case. It's important to establish things, not just suggest possibilities.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum