(August 27, 2010 at 1:13 am)Tsidkenu Wrote: absolutely. I agree. I think microevolution ans speciation is true. It happens. What i do not believe, is in common ancestry. I don't think evidence leads to this direction.
Micro and macro evolution are not scientific concepts. What you would call micro evolution, when spread over long time periods equates to what you would call macro evolution.
How can you believe in speciation but not common ancestry? So, what, you believe evolution works species to species but if you go back far enough at some point it wasn't working? If you accept that evolution can work species to species, then why do you not accept that the first species there ever was evolved into more species and hence we are descended?
Futhermore, you are being completely illogical by asking proof for evolution. There is no proof of any science. Scientific facts are not proven facts they are based very heavily on evidence.
The only proof there is are tautologies.... i.e. natural selection is somewhat a tautology in the sense that whatever survives is left to multiply, so those better at surviving stay to be multiplied while those worse at surviving, not so much. IOW: Whatever survives survives, and only what survives can multiply.
