(April 30, 2015 at 7:57 pm)snowtracks Wrote:(April 30, 2015 at 11:05 am)Tonus Wrote: Google "evolution of bipedalism in hominids" and you'll see that this isn't true. There are still questions about the evolution of bipedal hominids, but you seem content to shield yourself from even the stuff that has been learned in order to deny that it is known. If your worldview is dependent on ignorance to that degree, then it's time to broaden it or outright reject it.Those article state theories as to why there was evolution to hominids. Two problems: 1) Starts with the 'fact' that primates evolved into hominids. 2) No supporting anatomical evidence. The scientific organizations like Smithsonian, Nature Journal, etc. are required to always give an interpretation that supports a naturalism point of view or it doesn't get published (nothing wrong with doing that, it's in their policy statements).
These images are artist renditions to support naturalism. http://www.shutterstock.com/s/%22homo+sa...=188960081
"Bipedalism appeared suddenly in the fossil record" - None of the searches refute that statement.
You know nothing john snowtracks.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.