RE: Climate catastrophe isn't so certain
May 18, 2012 at 2:15 am
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2012 at 2:20 am by KichigaiNeko.)
(May 17, 2012 at 4:34 am)orogenicman Wrote:KichigaiNeko Wrote:What like reducing water vapour?? Which seems to be the primary culprit of GHG. nah CO2 is just a copout. NOT that we should continue to pollute as we have!!
You don't seriously believe that we can release billions of tons of CO2 (which, by the way, is almost always released in conjunction with those other polluting chemicals you were earlier agreeing needed to be dealth with) into the atmosphere year after year and see no response from the Earth? Surely you aren't suggesting that that is the case. Because, my friend, that would be rather naive.
No I am suggesting that we clean up our mess. Targeting CO2 emissions seems the easiest and yet there are so many other emissions that contribute to GHG.
I would LOVE to see the North Pacific Garbage Dump cleaned up for starters.
![[Image: 8442843_orig.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.occupyforanimals.org%2Fuploads%2F7%2F7%2F3%2F5%2F7735203%2F8442843_orig.png)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacif...bage_Patch![[Image: garbage-patch1.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=ascity.wpengine.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fgarbage-patch1.jpg)
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
