(February 17, 2014 at 9:03 am)Sword of Christ Wrote: Science is limited to what we can see with our eyes or is physically there to be detected in whatever way. You're claiming that everything that exists necessarily has to fit around the limits of what we can perceive in that manner for no good reason. But why does everything that exists have to fit around our own physical limitations?
Okay look, lemme make this easy for you: you only have your senses and the determinations of human experience and science with which to experience the world. There is no additional thing; your entire suite of experiential references is limited to your senses, the senses of others, and science.
You are positing an entity that science cannot demonstrate, and that you cannot perceive with your senses. Therefore, you have no method by which you can detect this entity. Therefore, you have no rational reason to believe its existence. Additionally, if this being cannot be falsified, then it similarly cannot be a rational thing.
No, you can't use rational arguments to demonstrate its existence, because rationality fails when you feed into it invalid premises, and you are loaded for bear with confirmation bias. You cannot think a thing into existence.
You have no reason to believe in god, if you're intent on making it scientifically unfalsifiable!
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!