The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

[Esquilax]

type 123 million years in google. See how many do not give error ranges. That proves the other point.

Ah yes, the fine, respected scientist, google.

If you actually believe that the contents of a google search, especially one as general as the one you've suggested, are reflective of the practices of the scientific community, then you are even less knowledgeable about science than we previously thought, and that is a true achievement in ignorance, Grace.

I have studied the different dating techniques. The case against them being accurate can be made.

No no, you don't just get to say that there's a case and the drop the mic as if we now have to take this as fact. Present the case.