RE: Intelligent Design: Did you design yourself?
May 31, 2014 at 8:19 pm
(This post was last modified: May 31, 2014 at 8:20 pm by Chas.)
(May 31, 2014 at 8:10 pm)Heywood Wrote:(May 31, 2014 at 8:04 pm)Chas Wrote: Your response has nothing to do with the statement. It is a complete non sequitur.
Negative Chas,
In my example God didn't need to create humans. Zod could have. The fact that God did create humans would be reason enough. If humans could have came to be naturally, but God created them anyways, the fact that God created them would be reason enough to acknowledge God as the creator of humans.
It all follows....you're just not that bright.
Your response was just more word salad. God/Zod/Fraud/whatever - the statement was not about a particular god, it was any god.
Multiplying the possible gods is simply idiotic.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.