Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?

[genkaus]

Losty... humans don't create humans with chemicals not possible to create from themselves. At best all they can do is create copies of themselves. I think you're arguing with someone off point here.

Create *better* copies - which was the point.

The nylon eating bacteria might be s new species, but it's not something that the universe didn't already contain the information to spawn, do you see?

Really? What else does the universe already contain information for?

Justice. There doesn't _have_ to be justice. Things just work out differently if there were. How? My perspective is different > my moral understanding is different > my quality of life is different.

2 things - Is your moral understanding consistent with your perspective and is the quality of life superior?

Revenge is always immoral for humans IMO. Why? Because we don't have sufficient knowledge to condemn.

How much is sufficient knowledge and why is it impossible for humans to have it?

I don't want you to suffer in an afterlife. You do in my dogma. Let me say it in a secular way: Do you want to live life in a way that benefits your nature and puts you in harmony with the world, or do you want to be selfish and live in disharmony with nature and suffer mentally and physically as a natural consequence of that? <---- that's all Christianity is saying. If you say that you want to live a full and happy life, then that's the same as a Christian saying that they want to believe in God. Jesus: "I came to give you life in all its fullness".

Like the proposition you presented here, Christianity is based on false dichotomy. Suffering mentally and physically is nit a natural consequence of being selfish or living in disharmony with nature. The same goes for Christianity - it is lying when it says that you need Jesus to live life at its fullness.

Injustice = reality for you. That's sad.

~Sad, but True.~