RE: Islam in Europe: perception and reality
April 3, 2016 at 4:32 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2016 at 4:33 pm by scoobysnack.)
(April 2, 2016 at 3:54 am)Heat Wrote:(April 2, 2016 at 2:58 am)scoobysnack Wrote: Even if it only took 1% to set off a nuclear weapon to destroy you? I agree, we shouldn't just have a blanket ban, but shouldn't you have some caution, or do you just not care about your life and other around you?I care about the other life around me thats WHY i dont want to ban innocent muslims from the country.
North Korea has Nuclear weapons and are ruled by a crazy unpredictable dictator. Does that mean we should go nuke the shit outta north korea? No, we set sanctions in place.
I understand that this is a bit of an unfair example but the point is that there are bad people in the world, and they do bad things. That doesnt mean or justify prosecuting anyone who could potentially be a bad person, as if they are a bad person, or will do a bad thing. Essentially what a majority of people on this thread want to do is implement a 'guilty until proven innocent' policy for Muslims in specific. I cannot accept this policy on both a legal level, and a moral level. So call me PC for sticking up for what I think is right, I couldnt care less, because sticking up for what is the right thing to do is never a worthless effort.
I hear ya, we can't group all people together for what a small minority do. However something needs to be done to find out people's desires of peace or violence. We also can just assume that they just want to live in peace, because there is a group that wants to get in and attack and disrupt. If it only takes a few people to carry out an attack, I would favor caution, instead of just letting people in. Also we are talking about this from a very low level of understanding, not a high level understanding of warfare, or even a globalization plan. Part of the plan to diminish traditional culture, erode national sovereignty, nationalism, bring in foreigners to aid in the disruption, which will make the citizens beg for more surveillance as a solution, and more rules over the country which is really what's needed to advance the plan of globalism. Nation states need to be broken, so a solution can be offered. The only way the people will take the bait is if their lives are in danger.
Those that just want to think this whole migrant crisis is something they need to accept out of the goodness of their heart, need to understand this is a grander plan.
An old plan, but not the official plan is the kalergi plan. Check that out, it's the kind of ideology that led to the EU to begin with.