Ephrium, you really need to address some of the points raised against you.
Humans have not created anything even remotely close to rivaling the complexity of the human body. Hypothetically, let's say we make a robot that can physically and intellectually out-perform human beings. With that in mind, can this SuperRobot survive on plants and water? Can it break down food sources in useful compounds, filter toxins, repair itself, eliminate waste or reproduce? Perhaps, but can it do this at the same level of efficiency and microscopic complexity as the human body? Doubtful.
Science has revealed a lot of information about the human body, but it's still a massive puzzle because of it's staggering complexity. There are so many subtle mechanics going on every second that there's no way we're anywhere close to creating something rivaling it.
I think it's a valid point that a creator must be at least as complex as the thing it's (intentionally) creating. Flukes and freak coincidences are possible, I suppose, but don't really apply to this argument.
Humans have not created anything even remotely close to rivaling the complexity of the human body. Hypothetically, let's say we make a robot that can physically and intellectually out-perform human beings. With that in mind, can this SuperRobot survive on plants and water? Can it break down food sources in useful compounds, filter toxins, repair itself, eliminate waste or reproduce? Perhaps, but can it do this at the same level of efficiency and microscopic complexity as the human body? Doubtful.
Science has revealed a lot of information about the human body, but it's still a massive puzzle because of it's staggering complexity. There are so many subtle mechanics going on every second that there's no way we're anywhere close to creating something rivaling it.
I think it's a valid point that a creator must be at least as complex as the thing it's (intentionally) creating. Flukes and freak coincidences are possible, I suppose, but don't really apply to this argument.
