Posts: 3226
Threads: 244
Joined: April 17, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 26, 2012 at 3:50 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2012 at 3:51 pm by Tea Earl Grey Hot.)
(September 26, 2012 at 3:43 pm)Tiberius Wrote: ...
I go further still, and argue that it is impossible for humans to ever know (in an absolute sense) anything. ...
I've heard this before, and in some ways it makes sense, but how is that not a self refuting statement? Aren't you effectively saying that "you know that you can't know anything"?
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
Posts: 176
Threads: 4
Joined: August 25, 2012
Reputation:
2
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 26, 2012 at 6:41 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2012 at 6:41 pm by System of Solace.)
(September 26, 2012 at 2:37 pm)Blackrook Wrote: So its really impossible to argue with Blackrook, because he recycles the same debunked arguments and make generalizations about groups based on the actions of one.
Fixed.
The true beauty of a self-inquiring sentient universe is lost on those who elect to walk the intellectually vacuous path of comfortable paranoid fantasies.
Posts: 2966
Threads: 124
Joined: May 12, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 26, 2012 at 6:50 pm
Quote:But the big clincher for me is the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima. I looked into that and there is no way to explain how 70,000 people could be affected by a "mass hypnosis" which is the usual atheist explanation for this even.
I think I can spot; 1 argument from incredulity, and 1 non written non-sequitur. Even though it isn't written, it is obvious what this sentence implies.
No way to explain how 70,000 people could be affected by "mass hypnosis", therefore Catholic God. Solid logic, son.
Dafuq do you smoke?
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 26, 2012 at 8:46 pm
(September 26, 2012 at 3:50 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: I've heard this before, and in some ways it makes sense, but how is that not a self refuting statement? Aren't you effectively saying that "you know that you can't know anything"? No. I said I argue that, not that I know it to be true. It is a belief, just as everything else is a belief. I can back it up with logical evidence though, which is why I believe it to be true. By the argument itself though, I do not know whether my argument is true or not.
To think of it another way, it is perfectly possible for one of my beliefs to be absolutely true. However, given that I am a fallible being, I have no way of knowing whether any of my beliefs are absolutely true.
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 26, 2012 at 9:00 pm
(September 26, 2012 at 8:46 pm)Tiberius Wrote: (September 26, 2012 at 3:50 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: I've heard this before, and in some ways it makes sense, but how is that not a self refuting statement? Aren't you effectively saying that "you know that you can't know anything"? No. I said I argue that, not that I know it to be true. It is a belief, just as everything else is a belief. I can back it up with logical evidence though, which is why I believe it to be true. By the argument itself though, I do not know whether my argument is true or not.
To think of it another way, it is perfectly possible for one of my beliefs to be absolutely true. However, given that I am a fallible being, I have no way of knowing whether any of my beliefs are absolutely true.
Are you certain you exist?
Are you certain you love a certain person when you do?
Are you certain you see colors?
Are you certain you truly believe you are uncertain about everything?
Posts: 3117
Threads: 16
Joined: September 17, 2012
Reputation:
35
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 26, 2012 at 9:07 pm
(September 26, 2012 at 9:00 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Are you certain you exist?
Rene Descartes Wrote:I think, therefore, I am
MysticKnight Wrote:Are you certain you love a certain person when you do? What is love, then? People say that it is intangible, so if you couldn't ever decide if you felt it, it wouldn't even exist, then.
MysticKnight Wrote:Are you certain you see colors? Yes, we have a certain understanding of the color spectrum and visible light.
MysticKnight Wrote:Are you certain you truly believe you are uncertain about everything? I don't believe that, but I suppose one could be uncertain in their belief of uncertainty (but would that prove they were uncertain of everything? What if they became aware of that fact and became certain they were uncertain? I'm not even going to try to sort that one out...)
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 26, 2012 at 9:15 pm
(September 26, 2012 at 2:59 pm)Blackrook Wrote: Ha, ha, there are a lot of CATHOLICS who don't know anything about transubstantiation so I wouldn't expect knowledge of this doctrine would be superior in a group of non-Catholics.
Uhh ... zombie food. Right?
![[Image: lastsupper.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i285.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fll59%2FIATIA%2Flastsupper.jpg)
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Posts: 28424
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 27, 2012 at 2:05 am
Descartes was an amateur.
(Though the part about him nailing the paws of dogs to a board and then cutting them open to reveal their beating hearts in order to demonstrate their lack of any real awareness of pain to be oddly, if a bit psychopathically, charming.)
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 27, 2012 at 3:12 am
(September 26, 2012 at 9:00 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Are you certain you exist?
Are you certain you love a certain person when you do?
Are you certain you see colors?
Are you certain you truly believe you are uncertain about everything? Certainty and absolute knowledge are completely different things.
Posts: 686
Threads: 3
Joined: December 13, 2010
Reputation:
9
RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
October 16, 2012 at 5:48 pm
Which is to say, my father is not Catholic because he was brow-beat into it by his family, he is a devout Catholic because he used his intelligence to look into it and determined that the Catholic Church's claim to be the One True Faith are true.
---------
In 1604 - the Catholic Church Burned Giordano Bruno at the stake for saying that the Sun was a star - the earth orbited the sun - and the earth rotated on its AXIS - and other things that turned out to be true as well.
That same church convicted Galileo of heresy for similar "beliefs" as well as others.
ANY educated person who claims that the catholic church represents the one true faith - in the light of the above - is simply not thinking
|
![[Image: Mv4GC.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FMv4GC.png)
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
