Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 9:54 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How do you rate?
#11
RE: How do you rate?
Oh, apathy, apathy. She is my mistress!
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#12
RE: How do you rate?
55% 11 correct and 9 wrong. Obviously since I love philosophy, I should learn more. lol
Reply
#13
RE: How do you rate?
75%.

I'm okay with that.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
#14
RE: How do you rate?
I'm sooooo ashamed. I think I flunkedSad 50%
binnyCoffee
Reply
#15
RE: How do you rate?
I got 70%, pretty good for somebody who has never studied philosophy.
Personally, it's not God I dislike, it's his fan club I can't stand.
Reply
#16
RE: How do you rate?
16/20

80%

Two of them I was unsure about and guessed 1 out of the two answers I thought it was. In both cases my 50/50 guess was wrong though. Could have almost have easily been 17/20 or 18/20, but I'm still happy with it because I've never had any training, I just like dictionaries, thesauruses and Wikipedia Wink

EvF
Reply
#17
RE: How do you rate?
(September 21, 2009 at 4:20 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: ... I've never had any training, I just like dictionaries, thesauruses and Wikipedia

That explains sooooo much!
Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when
called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.
(Oscar Wilde)
Reply
#18
RE: How do you rate?
All of reason is based upon a single fundamental... the syntax and vocabulary used serve to do nothing but exclude the less educated from philosophy.

I have never allowed societal definition to stop me from reasoning. Smile I am rather unconcerned with the 'field of study' questions, and therefore I leave them blank. (Although, I do know what is asked, and the answer they think correct.)

Btw... unless all creatures are people... some humans might not be people... unless a person is only so because they are human... in which case other advanced species are not people. It is the first one that would be most correct in the definition of "person". But as the question itself presents: this definition varies... a lot. Same with the definition of gods.... and the same with the definition of 1.

1 + 1 = 2... because one is always equal to itself... but what formulates one? That is a good question Smile (I.E. I am 'one' person... but I am made up of many atoms... which are made up of many sub-atoms, and those could be made up of many strings.) Even the fundamental of all reason is not defined the same for everyone. To some Christians, three separate entities are considered to be one Smile... then again, that is unreasonable... but the fact remains: things are defined differently by different people. Smile

And when does a one, and another one... become two? That too is a definition open to question.

As this is a test of the knowledge of definitions: I know only my own. I therefore do not take the test. Smile
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#19
RE: How do you rate?
...It's just a silly online test.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#20
RE: How do you rate?
...that defines your personal worth as a function of philosophical knowledge!
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)