Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 22, 2015 at 5:59 pm
(April 22, 2015 at 10:54 am)pocaracas Wrote: Should we let them know about that?
Is it safe for them to know that? Won't it create some sort of paradox in their minds and cause them to refuse the whole thing, thus locking themselves in their delusion even further?
The Kirk Manoeuvre is always entertaining.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 19552
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 22, 2015 at 6:21 pm
(April 22, 2015 at 5:59 pm)Stimbo Wrote: (April 22, 2015 at 10:54 am)pocaracas Wrote: Should we let them know about that?
Is it safe for them to know that? Won't it create some sort of paradox in their minds and cause them to refuse the whole thing, thus locking themselves in their delusion even further?
The Kirk Manoeuvre is always entertaining.
hmmm.... two options it seems there are...
Quote: The Kirk Maneuver aka The Inapproproate input Maneuver
(note: Captain Kirk is such a larger than life character that his maneuver has two variations)
Either...
...convince the sentient computer that in order to fulfil its directives it has to commit suicide...
...or...
...slip the tongue to the hot babe that is actually a soulless android/tentacled horror from Andromeda/whatever, and then watch her "newfound emotions" fry her brain. Gets 'em every time.
I'm guessing you want to go with the second, although the first does have some merit to it.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 22, 2015 at 6:26 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2015 at 6:26 pm by Cyberman.)
Given the total lack of opportunity for option 2, even given that the hot babe is a regular Earth lady painted green with bits of rubber on her face, the first one is, sadly, the only game in town for me.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 19552
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 23, 2015 at 9:40 am
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2015 at 9:40 am by pocaracas.)
(April 22, 2015 at 6:26 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Given the total lack of opportunity for option 2, even given that the hot babe is a regular Earth lady painted green with bits of rubber on her face, the first one is, sadly, the only game in town for me. I was going for a metaphorical blue green babe... but ok...
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 23, 2015 at 11:20 am
All my babes are metaphorical nowadays. The hue is entirely secondary.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 23, 2015 at 12:52 pm
snowtracks Wrote:but of course, there isn’t any paleontology evidence (the claim of ‘future discovery’ only has a limited shelf-life {please not again, that is so lame}). This is awesome. You try to cover for your ignorance by making it seem as if you're trying to head off a "gaps" argument (which should set off anyone's hypocrite meter immediately) and it takes less than an hour for someone to produce the evidence you thought didn't exist. Too bad you didn't warn us against using 'past discovery.'
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 13900
Threads: 262
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 23, 2015 at 12:54 pm
(April 23, 2015 at 11:20 am)Stimbo Wrote: All my babes are metaphorical nowadays. The hue is entirely secondary.
Try tinder.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 23, 2015 at 5:24 pm
That's no good - they just keep catching fire.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 23, 2015 at 8:49 pm
(April 23, 2015 at 12:52 pm)Tonus Wrote: snowtracks Wrote:but of course, there isn’t any paleontology evidence (the claim of ‘future discovery’ only has a limited shelf-life {please not again, that is so lame}). This is awesome. You try to cover for your ignorance by making it seem as if you're trying to head off a "gaps" argument (which should set off anyone's hypocrite meter immediately) and it takes less than an hour for someone to produce the evidence you thought didn't exist. Too bad you didn't warn us against using 'past discovery.'
Not to mention that the whole reason he's so derisive of future discoveries is so that he can continue to make huge arguments from ignorance while avoiding the very obvious rebuttal that, just because we don't know something yet, doesn't make his unjustified assertions any more plausible. 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
April 24, 2015 at 5:39 am
I think what we have is the argument from ignorance ad nauseam fallacy. It's not just a broken argument, it's a way of life.
|
