On the subject of homosexuality...

[Drich]

yes, but I know better than to read just one verse that you pick out, because that is exactly my point of this thread.
Did you read verse 5?
If a woman having long hair is equal to her covering her head, why does it say if she does not cover her head than that is EQUAL to her having short hair or a shaved head?

Now ask yourself according to this it a sin to have her head shaved or does it just bring her shame?

[Bad Writer]

Trick question: there is no sin.

---

(Obviously in the conceptual scheme of the Bible there is something called sin, but I felt I had to point out the obvious in order to score a point for reality)

[Ryantology]

Making a defense that actually weakens the gay community though is just a waste of time. It's the same result for Christians when stupid Fundies make up BS reasons against homosexual relationships....now I've heard both (well not all the Fundie ones) and can't determine which is more retarded....leading more towards this one, but that pendulum can change at any time.

If you really do believe that we are made in the image of God and were designed by a perfect designer, I'm actually raising an extremely valid point: if God did not want two men having anal sex with one another, why did he deliberately design the male body in such a way that anal sex between two men is not only possible but extremely pleasurable? Why deliberately make the prostate capable of easily triggering orgasms second only to actual genitalia if it is your intention that nobody ever uses it to do this?

You call this a stupid defense, but it's not a defense at all, because as I said, gay people don't require your permission and owe you no explanation. What it is, is a major inconsistency in the Christian belief system and you're flat-out refusing to acknowledge it, much less address it.